It's interesting comparing the FEC reports of Elwyn Tinklenberg and Bob Olson.
It's no secret why Tinklenberg's numbers were not released early. They are not that impressive, despite Elwyn's Will Ferrell-esqe persona of "don't tell me your not impressed."
$133,152 may look good from the outside but a more careful analysis points to some problems.
Of the $133,152, $71,500 came from Political Action Committee's.
Almost 54% of Elwyn Tinklenberg's fundraising came from PAC's!
I guess I missed the want ad in the St Cloud Times, "Congressman for Sale". I'd think Larry Schumacher would have pointed that one out.
With just over $96,000 on hand, it must be a disappointment for the Tinklenberg campaign to have relied so heavily on those who lurk the dark Washington DC corridors for money.
Compare to where Bob Olson is at.
Olson has just over $92,000 on hand and has taken ZERO money from Political Action Committee's. Olson has had over 500 individual donors, representing all areas of the 6th CD.
One thing that stood out to me in my first look at Tinklenberg's FEC report.
If Michael Guest is his fundraising director, which he stated publicaly on 12/13/07 as well, where is he on the FEC Report? Is he being paid by the Tinklenberg Group? Hassan Mainstreet LLC? It sure raises some interesting questions in my eyes. Is it an FEC violation to have someone on your campaign working but being paid by another group? Just curious...
It's quite obvious by now, someone is being anointed in the 6th to run against Bachmann. Clearly, by looking at his poast issues at MnDOT, a lob errr, interesting consulting past, and now his recent FEC report display fully the paper tiger in the room.
Are we ready to have OUR Congressional seat bought by those outside the 6th? I'm not naive, I fully understand the fundraising process, but when 54% of your entire campaign funds come from PAC's alone, and the vast remainder outside of the 6th, it shows a lack of grassroots support.
If those that are trying to buy this race are successful through the endorsment, I hope they save the receipt.
Unfortunately, it will be tough to return a bought candidate in August...
Thursday, January 31, 2008
Wednesday, January 30, 2008
MnBlue on Tinklenberg
Two Putt Tommy writes...
Afterall, this is really about beating Michele Bachmann isn't it?
No one wanted to talk about it. We've been talking about vetting our candidates for MONTHS now. Seriously, months.
So while some work hard to discredit the countless hours of work many of us have put in vetting the records of both Olson and Tinklenberg, I stand proud of the work we have done. Read that last sentence again, we're digging through Olson's past as well doing these searches of public records, etc.
Tommy is right. Many of us see this as a public service we are doing, since others across the 6th would rather bury their heads in the sand and hope Bachmann and the Republicans can't find this stuff.
I wanna beat Bachmann. It's that simple. From my perspective right now, from what many of us have been able to find, one of our candidates has enough baggage to fill the hull of a C5. It does not fit neatly in the overhead compartment nor under the seat in front of you.
Lastly, if both candidates records were anonymous, and one had to guess which one was the banker/tax attorney and which one was the former Methodist minister, based purely on their records...you'd guess wrong!
That said, what’s coming out of the Sixth District, cannot be ignored.
I’ve heard that those questioning El Tinklenberg’s lobbying, er, ‘scuse me, “consulting” activities simply have an axe to grind because THEY have a dog in the hunt. I’ve heard those questioning Tink saying it needs to be vetted now, because if we don’t do it now, Bachmann’s Bootlickers will do it later – and they’re simply doing due-diligence duty at the time due diligence is supposed to be done.
I happen to side with the latter. Quite frankly, what I’ve seen and heard, reeks. And if it’s true, it needs to be aired out, and aired out now; and if it’s not true, it needs to be STOPPED. NOW.Folks reading this can take the motivation of those that sent the letter to the U.S Attorney’s office any way they want; what they cannot deny is they pushed this issue to a “Put Up Or Shut Up” point.
And in the vetting of candidates, a “Put Up Or Shut Up” point is always a good thing.
Afterall, this is really about beating Michele Bachmann isn't it?
No one wanted to talk about it. We've been talking about vetting our candidates for MONTHS now. Seriously, months.
So while some work hard to discredit the countless hours of work many of us have put in vetting the records of both Olson and Tinklenberg, I stand proud of the work we have done. Read that last sentence again, we're digging through Olson's past as well doing these searches of public records, etc.
Tommy is right. Many of us see this as a public service we are doing, since others across the 6th would rather bury their heads in the sand and hope Bachmann and the Republicans can't find this stuff.
I wanna beat Bachmann. It's that simple. From my perspective right now, from what many of us have been able to find, one of our candidates has enough baggage to fill the hull of a C5. It does not fit neatly in the overhead compartment nor under the seat in front of you.
Lastly, if both candidates records were anonymous, and one had to guess which one was the banker/tax attorney and which one was the former Methodist minister, based purely on their records...you'd guess wrong!
Jack Nelson Pallmeyer endorsed by Progressive Action
A great endorsement for JNP!
Another glowing endorsement for Jack. Bluewoman and I are looking forward to seeing him again in Buffalo Saturday, perhaps I can convince her that we should go to Winona on Sunday...
“Progressive Action’s mission is to help carry on the legacy of the late Senator Paul Wellstone,” Progressive Action President Barb Olsen commented. “Progressive Action members voted to support Jack because they believe he’s the candidate who can best carry on that legacy and because Jack is right on the issues. Issues like ending the war in Iraq, pressing for universal single-payer health care, and finding alternatives to our country’s dependence on oil, all of which Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer is far stronger on than any other DFL candidate. And Jack is an incredibly effective campaigner, as anyone knows who saw him handily take the recent debate at St. Scholastica in Duluth.”
Another glowing endorsement for Jack. Bluewoman and I are looking forward to seeing him again in Buffalo Saturday, perhaps I can convince her that we should go to Winona on Sunday...
Elwyn Tinklenberg has some explaining to do
Since the 12/13/07 statement by Elwyn Tinklenberg at the SD 19 DFL meeting, where he stated publicly, "we do not lobby at the Federal level", many questions have arisen from his statements.
Eric Z from Developers are Crabgrass and Jerry Hiniker have forwarded a letter of inquiry to the US Attorney's Office in Minneapolis. The Department of Justice is charged with lobbying oversight at the Federal level.
Damn you Eric Black! Why did you have to push Rachel Paulose so hard!
Exactly, the questions need to be asked.
Elwyn Tinklenberg opened this Pandora's box. He could have come clean early and simply stated, "Yeah, I do some lobby work on Transportation issues with Senator X, Senator Y, and Congresswoman Z, but it's a small portion of what I do", this situation would have been averted.
Regardless if Tinklenberg lobbied Federal Government officials 18% of the time, or 56% of the time, the view of the public will be that he is indeed a lobbyist.
Once again, this exposes one of Tinklenberg's perceived strengths.
Tinklenberg is running on his record at MnDOT and his Transportation/Infrastructure knowledge and his apparent "socially conservative" past as a Methodist minister.
We've seen the evidence that Tinklenberg's MnDOT past is not as rosy as he would describe it.
His lobbying ties are also being called into question and, to put it bluntly, how can a delegate trust a former Methodist minister with a problem with honesty?
I'll be posting a town by town snapshot of Tinklenberg's work as a lobbyist/consultant over the next few days.
For now, the question has been asked...again!
Eric Z from Developers are Crabgrass and Jerry Hiniker have forwarded a letter of inquiry to the US Attorney's Office in Minneapolis. The Department of Justice is charged with lobbying oversight at the Federal level.
Damn you Eric Black! Why did you have to push Rachel Paulose so hard!
My key belief is if nobody else is asking what the Congressional candidate’s status is or should be under that federal enactment, it must be asked, and I ask it. Reasonably diligent research indicates Tinklenberg, himself, is not registered and I am not privy to the staff make-up of his “group” to check their status.
Certainly, that 20% --- 80% time-split thing in the definition seems a big enough loophole to drive a truck through, but if it is what Tinklenberg Group individuals rely upon in not being registered then it would be incumbent on Tinklenberg, in responding to the U.S. Attorney, to give accountings of his time and time of others billed to clients, and to square that with the public record my fellow citizen and I prepared.
In fairness to an electorate he wants to vote for him in November, disclosure should not be anything less than a full Tinklenberg Group public accounting, i.e., freely open to public and press, voluntarily, without worry over FOIA or other hurdles in citizens getting to see pertinent information.
Exactly, the questions need to be asked.
Elwyn Tinklenberg opened this Pandora's box. He could have come clean early and simply stated, "Yeah, I do some lobby work on Transportation issues with Senator X, Senator Y, and Congresswoman Z, but it's a small portion of what I do", this situation would have been averted.
Regardless if Tinklenberg lobbied Federal Government officials 18% of the time, or 56% of the time, the view of the public will be that he is indeed a lobbyist.
Once again, this exposes one of Tinklenberg's perceived strengths.
Tinklenberg is running on his record at MnDOT and his Transportation/Infrastructure knowledge and his apparent "socially conservative" past as a Methodist minister.
We've seen the evidence that Tinklenberg's MnDOT past is not as rosy as he would describe it.
His lobbying ties are also being called into question and, to put it bluntly, how can a delegate trust a former Methodist minister with a problem with honesty?
I'll be posting a town by town snapshot of Tinklenberg's work as a lobbyist/consultant over the next few days.
For now, the question has been asked...again!
Fox 9: John Edwards out!
Alix Kendall first said John McCain, but it's really John Edwards. Reported by the AP.
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Hillary Clinton trying to steal the election?
Interesting, posted at the CD 6 listserv as well, I am sure it will be met with strong resistance.
Hello All,
I want to call your attention to something rather ALARMING (but not surprising) that is happening presently. I'm writing this to all of you because I feel it needs further investigation and MAJOR exposure:
In much the same fashion that Bush & the RNC stole the Presidential elections in 2000 (Florida) & 2004 (Ohio), Clinton and the DNC are straight up stealing the Democratic Nomination in 2008. Now that Kucinich is out of the race there is no one to "keep them honest" (not that he had much luck getting the word out himself). If any of you have been following this sad excuse for a democracy, you may know that Obama has actually received the majority of the delegates from the 4 states that have voted (and had their delegates counted).
The current delegate breakdown is this: 63 - Obama / 48 - Clinton / 26 - Edwards (and yeah, I know that Clinton has more pledged superdelegates).So here's the deal (forgive me if I am going over material you already know here), the DNC punishes Michigan and Florida for pushing up their primary dates by stripping their delegates. As I understand it, the final decision to move the Michigan primary up falls to their governor who openly endorses Clinton repeatedly. The DNC tells candidates to remove their names from the ballot in Michigan. Obama & Edwards file to remove their names from the ballot, Clinton does not. The DNC then makes the Dem candidates pledge not to campaign in Michigan. The primary is panned by the press as "a beauty contest," it is written up as if there has been NO MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY at all, only a Republican primary. Clinton gets 55% of the "vote" in the most economically devastated industrial state in the country. Voters CANNOT EVEN WRITE IN Obama or Edwards as they did not file to be write in candidates (what kind of fucking law is that?). They are urged by those two campaigns to vote "uncommitted." Uncommitted gets 40% of the vote.
Just days before the Florida contest (with Clinton leading the polls 2:1), where again the candidates have pledged not to campaign, Clinton begins to give speeches calling for the delegates from Michigan and Florida to be restored. Various Democrats who have endorsed Clinton are doing the same, throwing words like voter "disenfranchisement" around, now the DNC (and Clinton) have insured that her delegate numbers in these two states will far outweigh Obama's results (indeed in Michigan she could have a clean sweep of ALL of the delegates...). Tonight, after winning Florida, she will make a speech (from Florida) calling for the restoration of the Michigan and Florida delegates. She will make a big show of it, as if she is advocating for the voting rights of these people, when in fact it is the DNC and her own campaign that has systematically disenfranchised these voters. Any move by the Obama campaign to stop this process will be written up to implicate them (shady as their tactics have been) in taking away these people's right to vote.
The bottom line: Michigan has 156 delegates, Florida has 210.TWO AND A HALF TIMES THE TOTAL NUMBER OF DELEGATES FROM THE FIRST FOUR ELECTIONS/CAUCUSES.Clearly winning these two states with a handy majority will give Clinton an advantage that may be impossible to overcome.
I have no intention of voting for any of these bastards, BUT if the DNC and Clinton ARE stealing this election and no one is even going to point out the truth? Well, it's going to be A LOT HARDER TO MAKE ANYTHING STICK ONCE THEY ARE IN THE WHITE HOUSE FOLKS...
So WHAT are we going to do about it?
Peace - Thomas Gallagher
www.forthposition.com
www.koo-sin-ich.comps.
Here's a few links to articles about Clinton calling for the delegates to be restored:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080125/ap_on_el_pr/clinton_florida_delegates;_ylt=At7Kaxdn8ChISx9pZGz8HIWs0NUE
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080128/pl_nm/usa_politics_florida_d_ylt=Agsu9Fmfjfr6Rx07B19Dh.ms0NUE
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/29/floridas-democratic-delegate-mess/
Hello All,
I want to call your attention to something rather ALARMING (but not surprising) that is happening presently. I'm writing this to all of you because I feel it needs further investigation and MAJOR exposure:
In much the same fashion that Bush & the RNC stole the Presidential elections in 2000 (Florida) & 2004 (Ohio), Clinton and the DNC are straight up stealing the Democratic Nomination in 2008. Now that Kucinich is out of the race there is no one to "keep them honest" (not that he had much luck getting the word out himself). If any of you have been following this sad excuse for a democracy, you may know that Obama has actually received the majority of the delegates from the 4 states that have voted (and had their delegates counted).
The current delegate breakdown is this: 63 - Obama / 48 - Clinton / 26 - Edwards (and yeah, I know that Clinton has more pledged superdelegates).So here's the deal (forgive me if I am going over material you already know here), the DNC punishes Michigan and Florida for pushing up their primary dates by stripping their delegates. As I understand it, the final decision to move the Michigan primary up falls to their governor who openly endorses Clinton repeatedly. The DNC tells candidates to remove their names from the ballot in Michigan. Obama & Edwards file to remove their names from the ballot, Clinton does not. The DNC then makes the Dem candidates pledge not to campaign in Michigan. The primary is panned by the press as "a beauty contest," it is written up as if there has been NO MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY at all, only a Republican primary. Clinton gets 55% of the "vote" in the most economically devastated industrial state in the country. Voters CANNOT EVEN WRITE IN Obama or Edwards as they did not file to be write in candidates (what kind of fucking law is that?). They are urged by those two campaigns to vote "uncommitted." Uncommitted gets 40% of the vote.
Just days before the Florida contest (with Clinton leading the polls 2:1), where again the candidates have pledged not to campaign, Clinton begins to give speeches calling for the delegates from Michigan and Florida to be restored. Various Democrats who have endorsed Clinton are doing the same, throwing words like voter "disenfranchisement" around, now the DNC (and Clinton) have insured that her delegate numbers in these two states will far outweigh Obama's results (indeed in Michigan she could have a clean sweep of ALL of the delegates...). Tonight, after winning Florida, she will make a speech (from Florida) calling for the restoration of the Michigan and Florida delegates. She will make a big show of it, as if she is advocating for the voting rights of these people, when in fact it is the DNC and her own campaign that has systematically disenfranchised these voters. Any move by the Obama campaign to stop this process will be written up to implicate them (shady as their tactics have been) in taking away these people's right to vote.
The bottom line: Michigan has 156 delegates, Florida has 210.TWO AND A HALF TIMES THE TOTAL NUMBER OF DELEGATES FROM THE FIRST FOUR ELECTIONS/CAUCUSES.Clearly winning these two states with a handy majority will give Clinton an advantage that may be impossible to overcome.
I have no intention of voting for any of these bastards, BUT if the DNC and Clinton ARE stealing this election and no one is even going to point out the truth? Well, it's going to be A LOT HARDER TO MAKE ANYTHING STICK ONCE THEY ARE IN THE WHITE HOUSE FOLKS...
So WHAT are we going to do about it?
Peace - Thomas Gallagher
www.forthposition.com
www.koo-sin-ich.comps.
Here's a few links to articles about Clinton calling for the delegates to be restored:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080125/ap_on_el_pr/clinton_florida_delegates;_ylt=At7Kaxdn8ChISx9pZGz8HIWs0NUE
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080128/pl_nm/usa_politics_florida_d_ylt=Agsu9Fmfjfr6Rx07B19Dh.ms0NUE
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/29/floridas-democratic-delegate-mess/
Fox 9 disses Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer
And Jim Cohen as well.
When they were discussing Betty McCollum's endorsement of Mike Ciresi, they cited Al Franken and Mike Ciresi as the only ones seeking the DFL endorsement.
Perhaps they don't realize that JNP recently defeated Franken and Ciresi in a recent TakeAction Minnesota straw poll.
Anyway, anyone wanting to express their opinion to Fox 9, shoot a note here.
When they were discussing Betty McCollum's endorsement of Mike Ciresi, they cited Al Franken and Mike Ciresi as the only ones seeking the DFL endorsement.
Perhaps they don't realize that JNP recently defeated Franken and Ciresi in a recent TakeAction Minnesota straw poll.
Anyway, anyone wanting to express their opinion to Fox 9, shoot a note here.
MinnPost on Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer
Once again, it's a bit older, but very good.
Indeed, Franken does not move me one way or the other. Ciresi is good, but Jack has a message of hope. "Idealism" trumped "electability" with Paul Wellstone.
It can happen again...
The DFL is understandably gun-shy about backing statewide candidates solely on the basis of their popularity within the party itself. It is also understandably leery of endorsing candidates whose weakness among the general electorate enhances the likelihood of a bruising primary challenge in which the officially endorsed candidate is dumped in favor of a better-known and funded figure. But in the case of Nelson-Pallmeyer, I think the party finds itself with a new kind of dilemma on its hands, one that it cannot solve by looking to the past for answers.
This year, the DFL candidate with the worst chances of gaining the party endorsement for Senate is the candidate with the best chance of winning the general election.
If the DFL runs Nelson-Pallmeyer against Coleman, he'll win in a rout. If they run Mike Ciresi, it's at best a toss-up. If the party chooses Franken — the candidate who, to date, has the best shot at winning the endorsement — Coleman wins and we get to spend another six years being represented by the political equivalent of the Scarecrow, the Tin Man and the Cowardly Lion, with a dash of Guiliani-esque family values all wrapped up in one unsavory package.
Indeed, Franken does not move me one way or the other. Ciresi is good, but Jack has a message of hope. "Idealism" trumped "electability" with Paul Wellstone.
It can happen again...
Bush VA Health Care lie
One of many from last nights SOTU address.
Bush said: “Over the past 7 years, we have increased funding for veterans by more than 95 percent. As we increase funding, we must also reform our veterans system to meet the needs of a new war and a new generation.”
FACT — 1.8 MILLION VETERANS LACK HEALTH INSURANCE: “The new study, published in the American Journal of Public Health, estimated that in 2004 nearly 1.8 million veterans were uninsured and unable to get care in veterans’ facilities.” [New York Times, 11/9/07]
FACT — NUMBER OF UNINSURED VETERANS INCREASED BETWEEN 2000 AND 2004: “Just under two million veterans (12.7 percent of non-elderly veterans) were uninsured in 2004, up 290,000 since 2000, the study published in the December, 2007 issue of the American Journal of Public Health found.” [Harvard Science, 10/30/07]
FACT — NEARLY 20 PERCENT OF VETERANS RETURNING FROM IRAQ HAVE MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES: “Screening efforts show 10% to 20% of Marines and soldiers returning from Afghanistan and Iraq may have suffered this wound, according to the Army. The task force last May found that ‘major gaps’ in identifying and treating the injury ‘were created by a lack of coordination and policy-driven approaches.’” [USA Today, 1/18/08]
FACT — NUMBER OF PTSD CASES INCREASING DRAMATICALLY: “The number of Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans seeking treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder from the Department of Veterans Affairs jumped by nearly 20,000 — almost 70% — in the 12 months ending June 30, VA records show.” [USA Today, 10/18/07]
Note that 2 of these facts would be negated had elected leaders displayed any semblance of a backbone to President Bush back in 2002.
Simply saying "I supported the war, based on the information available at the time" is a cop out and a slap in the face to Veterans and progressives alike.
Bush said: “Over the past 7 years, we have increased funding for veterans by more than 95 percent. As we increase funding, we must also reform our veterans system to meet the needs of a new war and a new generation.”
FACT — 1.8 MILLION VETERANS LACK HEALTH INSURANCE: “The new study, published in the American Journal of Public Health, estimated that in 2004 nearly 1.8 million veterans were uninsured and unable to get care in veterans’ facilities.” [New York Times, 11/9/07]
FACT — NUMBER OF UNINSURED VETERANS INCREASED BETWEEN 2000 AND 2004: “Just under two million veterans (12.7 percent of non-elderly veterans) were uninsured in 2004, up 290,000 since 2000, the study published in the December, 2007 issue of the American Journal of Public Health found.” [Harvard Science, 10/30/07]
FACT — NEARLY 20 PERCENT OF VETERANS RETURNING FROM IRAQ HAVE MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES: “Screening efforts show 10% to 20% of Marines and soldiers returning from Afghanistan and Iraq may have suffered this wound, according to the Army. The task force last May found that ‘major gaps’ in identifying and treating the injury ‘were created by a lack of coordination and policy-driven approaches.’” [USA Today, 1/18/08]
FACT — NUMBER OF PTSD CASES INCREASING DRAMATICALLY: “The number of Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans seeking treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder from the Department of Veterans Affairs jumped by nearly 20,000 — almost 70% — in the 12 months ending June 30, VA records show.” [USA Today, 10/18/07]
Note that 2 of these facts would be negated had elected leaders displayed any semblance of a backbone to President Bush back in 2002.
Simply saying "I supported the war, based on the information available at the time" is a cop out and a slap in the face to Veterans and progressives alike.
Interesting Lobbyist Story
Non-Tinklenberg related for those wondering....
Raw Story has a story up, post State of the Union Address, on the impact on Federal Lobbying.
A crisis in the lobbying industry? Perhaps that's why the economy is, well, headed for a recession.
I have an idea, why don't we just elect lobbyists to the House and Senate and eliminate the need for the "middle guy"?
The "good ones" don't seem to be worried though.
"...folks like us who are really good" heh?
Me thinks there is a fine line between very good and having the key's to the Congresspersons front door.
Raw Story has a story up, post State of the Union Address, on the impact on Federal Lobbying.
Trouble has been building for earmark lobbyists for years since separate scandals involving earmark improprieties sent lobbyist Jack Abramoff and former Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham (R-CA) to jail.
The crackdown on targeted spending projects secreted into appropriations bills seems to be reaching a head, and one lobbyist told Roll Call the industry is "pretty close" to a crisis.
A crisis in the lobbying industry? Perhaps that's why the economy is, well, headed for a recession.
I have an idea, why don't we just elect lobbyists to the House and Senate and eliminate the need for the "middle guy"?
The "good ones" don't seem to be worried though.
"Ironically, the more they raise the bar, the more folks like us who are really good are valued," lobbyist Rich Gold told Newmyer. Gold heads the lobbying practice at Holland & Knight, where he said business has grown at least 10 percent for the last two years.
"...folks like us who are really good" heh?
Me thinks there is a fine line between very good and having the key's to the Congresspersons front door.
Nelson-Pallmeyer wins TakeAction straw poll
Bluewoman pointed this out to me last night.
Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer - 54.1%
Al Franken - 41%
Ciresi - 4%
None of the above - 1%
JNP has had a strong base of progressives behind him. This straw poll must be a pretty significant disappointment for Ciresi, who I would label as more progressive than Franken.
Nonetheless, it's a great showing for Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer as we move closer and closer to precinct caucuses and our local unit conventions!
Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer - 54.1%
Al Franken - 41%
Ciresi - 4%
None of the above - 1%
JNP has had a strong base of progressives behind him. This straw poll must be a pretty significant disappointment for Ciresi, who I would label as more progressive than Franken.
Nonetheless, it's a great showing for Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer as we move closer and closer to precinct caucuses and our local unit conventions!
CD 3 news: A "new" Erik Paulson?
Two Putt Tommy at Mn Blue has the scoop!
With Ashwin Madia gaining momentum everyday, this will be an interesting race to watch. I'd love to see a true progressive go at it with Mr Paulsen...
Consider this: "Failed ideas and yearning for the past stand in the way of change. So do the politics of blame, division and partisan spin. Minnesotans are weary of this brand of politics." (emphasis added).
Say, Erik?
THAT'S YOUR PARTY YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.
Especially in Eden Prairie, in Paulsen's home town. Paulsen's party's website is the epitome of blame, division, and partisan spin.
Gentle readers, that's the local GOP website that blamed the DFL and spun the per diem issue; that put Erik Paulsen (along with David Hann) in the position of: "Well, I voted against it, before I profited from it."
With Ashwin Madia gaining momentum everyday, this will be an interesting race to watch. I'd love to see a true progressive go at it with Mr Paulsen...
Monday, January 28, 2008
Olson on the State of the Union Address
It's a good thing I was driving home from work during the State of the Union. Had I been playing the SOTU address game, I would have been "full" by 8:24.
It may have been the Pell Grants for kids thing that pushed me over the edge...
Olson on SOTU: Bush 'Failed the Great Test of Leadership'
For Immediate Release
Contact: Christopher Truscott
ANOKA—Bob Olson, a DFL candidate in the 6th Congressional District, released the following statement in response to President George W. Bush's State of the Union address:
"On a day when five troops were killed in Iraq, President Bush failed to deliver the exit plan our soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines have earned.
"On a day when 9 million children went uninsured, President Bush failed to deliver health care coverage for the most vulnerable among us.
"On a day when millions of working families worried about losing their homes, President Bush failed to deliver a plan to end the agony.
"On a day when his country needed him most, President Bush failed the great test of leadership—again."
It may have been the Pell Grants for kids thing that pushed me over the edge...
Olson on SOTU: Bush 'Failed the Great Test of Leadership'
For Immediate Release
Contact: Christopher Truscott
ANOKA—Bob Olson, a DFL candidate in the 6th Congressional District, released the following statement in response to President George W. Bush's State of the Union address:
"On a day when five troops were killed in Iraq, President Bush failed to deliver the exit plan our soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines have earned.
"On a day when 9 million children went uninsured, President Bush failed to deliver health care coverage for the most vulnerable among us.
"On a day when millions of working families worried about losing their homes, President Bush failed to deliver a plan to end the agony.
"On a day when his country needed him most, President Bush failed the great test of leadership—again."
The real State of the Union...
Minnesota Leaders Reflect on Bush Legacy On Same Day President Delivers Final State of the Union Speech
St. Paul, MN – On the same day that President Bush delivers his final State of the Union address, Minnesota Leaders held a roundtable discussion at the MN State Capitol to reflect upon the impact that the Bush Legacy has had in Minnesota . *See below 'Then and Now' document highlighting the staggering regression the nation has seen, both foreign and domestic, since President Bush took office in January 2001. According to a new nationwide Harris Poll, four out of five Americans (81%) think that the current state of the country is fair or poor while just 19 percent think it is excellent or good. Just two percent of Americans think the state of the country is excellent. Last year at this time, three in ten (31%) thought the state of the country was excellent or good while 69 percent felt it was fair or poor.
Kris Jacobs, Executive Director for Jobs Now Coalition, commented on the current job situation in Minnesota . "Keep in mind that job quality is affected by job quantity. The MN Job Vacancy Survey shows that over the last six and a half years, the number of job openings in the state has gone down by 58 percent. With 133,000 unemployed workers now competing for only 60,000 unfilled jobs, job seekers outnumber unfilled jobs by more than two-to-one," said Jacobs.
Chris Stinson of ACORN, discussed the MN foreclosure crisis. "President Bush has described the economy as inherently strong. That's not how it looks in Minnesota neighborhoods: foreclosures are as bad, or worse, than they have been since the great depression. The President needs to get relief to the people affected by this crisis and he needs to do it tonight in the State of the Union ," said Stinson.
"Energy prices are contributing significantly to the bleak economic state faced by low and moderate income Minnesotans," said Pam Marshall, Executive Director of the Energy Cents Coalition. "Annual costs for electricity are 26.5% higher than just seven years ago, while the price for a gallon of fuel oil is 139% greater," continued Marshall .
From massive 'tax cuts for the rich' that never managed to trickle-down to regular working Americans as the nation now heads into a full blown recession, to leading the nation into the quagmire in Iraq that has no end in sight at extraordinary cost in American lives, treasure and priorities like education and healthcare here at home – President Bush's policies have been a disaster. Bush's legacy is one of rising unemployment, rising healthcare costs, rising college tuition, a mortgage crisis, millions more Americans without insurance, the largest increase in inflation in 17 years, gas prices hovering around $3 a gallon, a weak dollar, a $167 billion budget deficit, and a $9.2 trillion national debt – a legacy that will burden our grandchildren for decades to come. 
St. Paul, MN – On the same day that President Bush delivers his final State of the Union address, Minnesota Leaders held a roundtable discussion at the MN State Capitol to reflect upon the impact that the Bush Legacy has had in Minnesota . *See below 'Then and Now' document highlighting the staggering regression the nation has seen, both foreign and domestic, since President Bush took office in January 2001. According to a new nationwide Harris Poll, four out of five Americans (81%) think that the current state of the country is fair or poor while just 19 percent think it is excellent or good. Just two percent of Americans think the state of the country is excellent. Last year at this time, three in ten (31%) thought the state of the country was excellent or good while 69 percent felt it was fair or poor.
Kris Jacobs, Executive Director for Jobs Now Coalition, commented on the current job situation in Minnesota . "Keep in mind that job quality is affected by job quantity. The MN Job Vacancy Survey shows that over the last six and a half years, the number of job openings in the state has gone down by 58 percent. With 133,000 unemployed workers now competing for only 60,000 unfilled jobs, job seekers outnumber unfilled jobs by more than two-to-one," said Jacobs.
Chris Stinson of ACORN, discussed the MN foreclosure crisis. "President Bush has described the economy as inherently strong. That's not how it looks in Minnesota neighborhoods: foreclosures are as bad, or worse, than they have been since the great depression. The President needs to get relief to the people affected by this crisis and he needs to do it tonight in the State of the Union ," said Stinson.
"Energy prices are contributing significantly to the bleak economic state faced by low and moderate income Minnesotans," said Pam Marshall, Executive Director of the Energy Cents Coalition. "Annual costs for electricity are 26.5% higher than just seven years ago, while the price for a gallon of fuel oil is 139% greater," continued Marshall .
From massive 'tax cuts for the rich' that never managed to trickle-down to regular working Americans as the nation now heads into a full blown recession, to leading the nation into the quagmire in Iraq that has no end in sight at extraordinary cost in American lives, treasure and priorities like education and healthcare here at home – President Bush's policies have been a disaster. Bush's legacy is one of rising unemployment, rising healthcare costs, rising college tuition, a mortgage crisis, millions more Americans without insurance, the largest increase in inflation in 17 years, gas prices hovering around $3 a gallon, a weak dollar, a $167 billion budget deficit, and a $9.2 trillion national debt – a legacy that will burden our grandchildren for decades to come.
State of the Union game...
Bluewoman and I may try this tonight...
One exception though...
Every time the camera shows....your congressman/woman: the site encourages you to pat yourself on the back...
Those of us in the 6th are going to cringe, hoping that they have doubled the secret service presence for the President's grand entrance and exit.
If you want a positive action though, go ahead and send Bob Olson for Congress $10 everytime you see Congresswoman Bachmann tonight, both at the State of the Union and through local news coverage of Bachmann's actions tonight.
One exception though...
Every time the camera shows....your congressman/woman: the site encourages you to pat yourself on the back...
Those of us in the 6th are going to cringe, hoping that they have doubled the secret service presence for the President's grand entrance and exit.
If you want a positive action though, go ahead and send Bob Olson for Congress $10 everytime you see Congresswoman Bachmann tonight, both at the State of the Union and through local news coverage of Bachmann's actions tonight.
Tinklenberg's lobbying: "We don't lobby at the federal level"
"We don't lobby at the Federal level"- Elwyn Tinklenberg, 2008 CD 6 DFL candidate. 12-13-07, Buffalo, MN.
ENGAGEMENT OF I-94 LOBBYIST
City Administrator Kruse addressed the Council asking what their wishes were after they had a chance to hear what Mr. Tinklenberg had to share with them. Does the Council wish to go ahead with hiring Mr. Tinklenberg as a Lobbyist to represent Albertville?
Mayor Peterson feels Albertville needs to go ahead with hiring a lobbyist. Council member Fay was in favor of hiring a lobbyist but has hopes of getting some funds in return. Council member Berning was not much in favor of hiring a lobbyist at this point. Council member Vetsch was new and was hesitant on hiring a lobbyist. Council member Klecker agreed with Peterson and Fay to go ahead with hiring a lobbyist.
Council understood the need to action now because Congress is back in session if the City wants to get any financial assistance from the federal and state levels.
City Administrator Kruse wanted to clarify with City Attorney Couri how would the City draft the contract between the City of Albertville and Mr. Tinklenberg. Some discussion ensued about how to structure an agreement.
MOTION BY Mayor Peterson, seconded by Council member Fay to have staff work with Mr. Tinklenberg to outline a work plan and an agreement for Tinklenberg to Lobby for I-94 funding and report back to the January 18, 2005 Council meeting. Mayor Peterson, Council members Fay, Klecker, and Vetsch voted aye. Council member Berning voted nay. Motion carried. (emphasis added)
Why the discussion of "Congress" "financial assistance from the federal and state levels" and "I-94 funding" if someone does not lobby at "the federal level"?
Why would Elwyn deny lobbying at the federal level when it's pretty clear that he is? What is he hiding?
More to follow on Tinklenberg's lobbying ties...Sunday, January 27, 2008
Stonewall DFL endorses Olson!
From Dump Bachmann
Stonewall DFL endorsed Bob Olson at their board meeting today. This endorsement was not a knock on Elwyn Tinklenberg, who they also found was good on LGBT issues. It was the board's thought that Olson showed more leadership on these issues.
Stonewall DFL endorsed Bob Olson at their board meeting today. This endorsement was not a knock on Elwyn Tinklenberg, who they also found was good on LGBT issues. It was the board's thought that Olson showed more leadership on these issues.
Bob Olson: American-Made Energy Offers Chance for Economic Boom
American-Made Energy Offers Chance for Economic Boom
For Immediate Release
Contact: Christopher Truscott
ANOKA—Bob Olson, a DFL candidate in the 6th Congressional District, had the following opinion article published today on Minnesota Campaign Report.
In the piece, pasted below, Olson provides a short outline on how sustainable energy development can serve as an economic boom for America in much the same way the Internet did a decade ago.
American-Made Energy Offers Chance for Economic Boom
By Bob Olson
Short-term economic stimulus plans in Washington are almost as plentiful as lobbyists. Everyone seems to have at least one: the president, those who want to become president, representatives, senators and probably even a few interns in the White House and on Capitol Hill.
But all of these plans share a critical flaw: they're short-term. Extending unemployment benefits and providing tax rebates/other breaks to middle-income families is fine (and very necessary), but if we want to create the kind of sustainable, long-term recovery America needs we have to look further down the field.
Every great economic boom of the last century has followed some kind of major societal shift or technological advance—like the invention of the automobile at the turn of the 1900s, the migration to the suburbs in the middle of the 20th century or the commercialization of the Internet in the 1990s.
We have to capture that kind of magic again and we can. The answer is right here in Minnesota: renewable energy.
Our business community, farmers, universities, state Legislature and Gov. Tim Pawlenty have been leaders in this critically important area. Now it's time for Congress and the president to follow.
To read the entire article, click here.
For Immediate Release
Contact: Christopher Truscott
ANOKA—Bob Olson, a DFL candidate in the 6th Congressional District, had the following opinion article published today on Minnesota Campaign Report.
In the piece, pasted below, Olson provides a short outline on how sustainable energy development can serve as an economic boom for America in much the same way the Internet did a decade ago.
American-Made Energy Offers Chance for Economic Boom
By Bob Olson
Short-term economic stimulus plans in Washington are almost as plentiful as lobbyists. Everyone seems to have at least one: the president, those who want to become president, representatives, senators and probably even a few interns in the White House and on Capitol Hill.
But all of these plans share a critical flaw: they're short-term. Extending unemployment benefits and providing tax rebates/other breaks to middle-income families is fine (and very necessary), but if we want to create the kind of sustainable, long-term recovery America needs we have to look further down the field.
Every great economic boom of the last century has followed some kind of major societal shift or technological advance—like the invention of the automobile at the turn of the 1900s, the migration to the suburbs in the middle of the 20th century or the commercialization of the Internet in the 1990s.
We have to capture that kind of magic again and we can. The answer is right here in Minnesota: renewable energy.
Our business community, farmers, universities, state Legislature and Gov. Tim Pawlenty have been leaders in this critically important area. Now it's time for Congress and the president to follow.
To read the entire article, click here.
JNP: Twin Cities Daily Planet
Older story, but interesting comments.
Indeed. Courted by the other Senate campaigns, I think deep down, I always identified with Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer. Bluewoman and I had this discussion months ago, after seeing Jack again in Biscay. To be completely honest, Bluewoman was a strong JNP supporter before I was. I was on the fence, per se, looking for an easy out, an easy way to dismiss my own political senses about Jack.
The whole "electability" tag is something that has bothered me for quite some time now. Oftentimes, it's outside interests that work to determine a candidates "electability". I've heard it said about Bob Olson and Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer.
We all heard it about Paul Wellstone too! It reminds me of one of my favorite Wellstone quotes.
So true. It's time for progressives to stand up for what we believe in, and fight for it. That's why I have been fighting for Bob Olson, and will fight for Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer. They are not the "good ole boys club" of DFL politics. The last thing we need is another elected official who will work for the special interests!
To finish this post/rant off, here is a wonderful comment by Bob Spaulding:
Character does matter...
When it comes to the general election, the Democrat with the best shot of knocking off Norm Coleman is Nelson-Pallmeyer a.) because he offers the clearest contrast to Coleman and b.) he is able to articulate clearly, passionately, and with no hesitation positions Minnesotans are desperate to hear.
As a result of this paradox, leading progressive DFL officeholders are torn. Though actively courted by the Franken and Ciresi campaigns, their hearts belong with Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer who, for whatever reason – lack of resources, a principled refusal to indulge in politics-as-usual – has not been as active in garnering their support. Now It’s not unusual for party activists to feel that their hearts belong to one candidate but their heads belong to another, with “electability” usually trumping “idealism.” In the case of Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer, however, no such split between heart and head is necessary. If DFL-ers can shake off conventional wisdom and take a really clear-eyed look at today’s political realities, they will see that, this time around, Nelson-Pallmeyer is that rare electoral commodity, an underdog who is, in reality, the topdog – an outsider with the best chance of landing a Democrat in Coleman’s Senate seat.
Indeed. Courted by the other Senate campaigns, I think deep down, I always identified with Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer. Bluewoman and I had this discussion months ago, after seeing Jack again in Biscay. To be completely honest, Bluewoman was a strong JNP supporter before I was. I was on the fence, per se, looking for an easy out, an easy way to dismiss my own political senses about Jack.
The whole "electability" tag is something that has bothered me for quite some time now. Oftentimes, it's outside interests that work to determine a candidates "electability". I've heard it said about Bob Olson and Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer.
We all heard it about Paul Wellstone too! It reminds me of one of my favorite Wellstone quotes.
"If we don't fight hard enough for the things we stand for, at some point we have to recognize that we don't really stand for them."
So true. It's time for progressives to stand up for what we believe in, and fight for it. That's why I have been fighting for Bob Olson, and will fight for Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer. They are not the "good ole boys club" of DFL politics. The last thing we need is another elected official who will work for the special interests!
To finish this post/rant off, here is a wonderful comment by Bob Spaulding:
It’s been years since I would have written a piece like this. There’s something profoundly different about this year. Change is in the air, America’s long reflection on issues of peace in our world and change in our climate are making the electorate yearn for a new vision for our future. Rich’s general premise — that in a year of change, Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer has the best chance to win — is a truly compelling premise, and deserves focused consideration by my fellow DFLers.
Americans are yearning for new ideas and approaches on issues like climate change and global peace. These are transformational issues that reach us so deeply, with such profound consequences, as to have the rare power to lead us to new, unforeseen opportunities. Jack owns these issues. This is a quintessential transformational moment in American politics, a time when the ground is quaking beneath us. It’s not a time where narrow, poll-tested messages can produce outcomes with any consistency. Especially in a state with Minnesota’s history.
As a sufferer of Norm Coleman’s reign over St. Paul (whose aftereffects still reverberate today), what a contrast Nelson-Pallmeyer would be. We’ve learned all too readily that Coleman exudes a weak compass, frequently seeming to average Minnesotans like some sort of huckster that dropped in on us from the
east coast, even as his wife cavorts out west. Franken indeed does not have the
consistency of character to be a good contrast, and may struggle to shed his own east coast carpetbagger image. Ciresi’s somewhat better, but comes off too frequently like a chilly lawyer, not a leader ready to harness the wind of transformation.
Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer so obviously and genuinely speaks from the heart, and is so obviously brings credibility and strong character, and represents the best of Minnesota in a way that will contrast decisively with Coleman. He brings a familiar reassurance along with critical hope on issues of peace and the outdoors that Minnesotans care deeply about.
Sometimes the we need a candidate that exudes safety before possibility and hope. Two years ago, I supported Amy Klobuchar as the kind of candidate Democrats needed in a time where Americans were still deeply uncertain about the political climate. But at other times, when the momentum of the country aims so clearly for change, the DFL’s best chance of winning is to hitch its bandwagon to that theme of change. Our best chance of unseating Norm Coleman is by producing a candidate who can articulate a hopeful vision contrasts clearly with Norm’s compromised leadership. We need a candidate that inspires confidence and consistency of character needed to score a win.
As a Chair and leader in my local DFL unit, there’s a clear role for the Amy Klobuchar’s of the world, when the electoral DFL needs are different. But in this year, in our Minnesota, we need someone to speak the plainly and honestly, and harness change in a way that resonates with average Minnesotans. Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer best captures that opportunity. We ought to take this opportunity this year to support the candidate that can not only transform the debate, but in seizing this transformational moment, also has the best chance of winning.
Character does matter...
Saturday, January 26, 2008
John Kline supports bridges in Iraq but not in CD 2
The Hastings Star-Gazette has an interesting story.
And
From Dump John Kline.
Billions of dollars spent to build infrastructure in Iraq, all supported by Congressman Kline. It's also interesting to note that Kline cites the "bridge to nowhere" as an example. He voted for it!
Minnesota 2nd District Rep. John Kline, R-Lakeville, thinks the replacement of the Hastings bridge is a project with merit. Unfortunately though, Kline said that doesn’t matter very much when it comes to getting federal money earmarked for the bridge’s replacement.
And
Kline points to bills that paid for new lighting in a Los Angeles fashion district and a $200 million “bridge to nowhere” in Alaska as examples of projects without much merit being funded.
From Dump John Kline.
John Kline voted millions for Alaska's notorious 'Bridge to Nowhere' but won't vote to fund replacing Minnesota's I35 Bridge! Yes...John Kline who votes unlimited funding to built bridges in Iraq, won't vote to build bridges at home locally! Congressman John Kline has abandoned Minnesota, ceased to perform his duties, and is now a detriment to Minnesota.
Billions of dollars spent to build infrastructure in Iraq, all supported by Congressman Kline. It's also interesting to note that Kline cites the "bridge to nowhere" as an example. He voted for it!
Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer for Senate
I've seen all the candidates.
I chatted with Al Franken in Monticello at the VFW. Spoke to Frannie in Biscay and Darwin.
Spent some great time with Mike Ciresi in Monticello and Otsego. Spoke to one of his sons in Biscay and Darwin as well.
Talked with Jim Cohen in Otsego, Biscay and Darwin, as well as sitting with him at the Founder's Day dinner in St Paul.
I'd been leaning Mike Ciresi for quite some time. I really like Mike. I think he would make a great US Senator.
I have reservations about Al Franken and simply put, can't support Jim Cohen.
I'm a liberal.
I'm a liberal who was proud of the work of Paul Wellstone. I believe in "Stand Up, Keep Fighting!"
Bluewoman and I first met Jack at the CD 6 Garden Party in Otsego this summer. He had not officially announced his candidacy yet, but we both walked away pretty impressed with Jack.
We checked out the other candidates as they came through the area. Neither of us felt a strong connection to Franken or Cohen, although we both know they would be a vast improvement over Senator Oversight, Norm Coleman.
And while Ciresi connected with me, Jack connected with both Bluewoman and I. After meeting us in Otsego, he remembered who we were quite some time later in Biscay, for the McLeod County Hog Roast fundraiser.
I brought back memories of my meetings with Paul Wellstone, powerful meetings that have formed my political identity.
Jack does that for me. While he is not the favorite in this race, neither was Paul Wellstone, he is better aligned with what I stand for as a liberal, socially progressive Democrat.
He does not support NAFTA nor CAFTA.
Like another candidate I strongly support, Bob Olson, he has strong positions on the environment and sustainable / renewable energy.
He understands the tragedy that has become the Iraq War.
It's much deeper than issues though. A recent story in Labor World says it more eloquently than Blueman ever could.
Authentic and principled leadership.
That's why I support Bob Olson.
That's why I support Ashwin Madia.
And that is why both Bluewoman and I support Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer.
I chatted with Al Franken in Monticello at the VFW. Spoke to Frannie in Biscay and Darwin.
Spent some great time with Mike Ciresi in Monticello and Otsego. Spoke to one of his sons in Biscay and Darwin as well.
Talked with Jim Cohen in Otsego, Biscay and Darwin, as well as sitting with him at the Founder's Day dinner in St Paul.
I'd been leaning Mike Ciresi for quite some time. I really like Mike. I think he would make a great US Senator.
I have reservations about Al Franken and simply put, can't support Jim Cohen.
I'm a liberal.
I'm a liberal who was proud of the work of Paul Wellstone. I believe in "Stand Up, Keep Fighting!"
Bluewoman and I first met Jack at the CD 6 Garden Party in Otsego this summer. He had not officially announced his candidacy yet, but we both walked away pretty impressed with Jack.
We checked out the other candidates as they came through the area. Neither of us felt a strong connection to Franken or Cohen, although we both know they would be a vast improvement over Senator Oversight, Norm Coleman.
And while Ciresi connected with me, Jack connected with both Bluewoman and I. After meeting us in Otsego, he remembered who we were quite some time later in Biscay, for the McLeod County Hog Roast fundraiser.
I brought back memories of my meetings with Paul Wellstone, powerful meetings that have formed my political identity.
Jack does that for me. While he is not the favorite in this race, neither was Paul Wellstone, he is better aligned with what I stand for as a liberal, socially progressive Democrat.
He does not support NAFTA nor CAFTA.
Like another candidate I strongly support, Bob Olson, he has strong positions on the environment and sustainable / renewable energy.
He understands the tragedy that has become the Iraq War.
It's much deeper than issues though. A recent story in Labor World says it more eloquently than Blueman ever could.
The second reason I am supporting Jack is deeply personal. I, like many folks, still consider this seat Paul’s seat. And I, like many, want to defeat Norm Coleman so badly I can taste it. Maybe Al or Mike can win. And if either of them do win, they will cast a decent vote, most of the time. But for me, it is not enough to settle for just a decent vote in Paul Wellstone’s seat. I want more than a vote – I want a voice that speaks out, is never silenced, and is always courageous, always pushing for what is necessary and in doing so is redefining what is possible. That’s what Paul did so eloquently and effectively. There will be compromises, of course. That is simply part of getting things done. But like Paul Wellstone, Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer will never sacrifice his principles, or his ideals.
Can Jack ultimately win? I don’t know. I gave up predicting that a long time ago. Paul and Jesse Ventura were never supposed to win and they did. Few would have predicted that Skip Humphrey – the most popular Attorney General in Minnesota history – would come in a distant third. What I do know is that Jack offers a true difference and a real choice of authentic and principled leadership, and we desperately need that in Washington now more than ever.
Authentic and principled leadership.
That's why I support Bob Olson.
That's why I support Ashwin Madia.
And that is why both Bluewoman and I support Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer.
Ashwin Madia op ed
From the Minnesota Daily.
Go read the op ed in its entirety. Listening to Ashwin's radio ads and hearing the buzz from party activists I know, Madia is the real deal.
Perhaps I will have to check this out for myself at the SD 41 hosted CD 3 candidate forum tomorrow in Bloomington. 2 pm, Bloomington City Council Chambers.
It's amazing to me how many people who have no problem sending 18- and 19-year-old kids thousands of miles to Iraq to fight - and even die - in the Iraq war are concerned about sending a 30-year-old to Washington to end it and advocate on veterans' behalf. They are so adjusted to the paradigm that young people have no place in our process that it baffles them when we step forward to contribute to our national discussion. I want to change that paradigm. We are all in this together. The Iraq war, fiscal irresponsibility, global warming, health care unavailability, and the assault on our civil liberties affect all of us - young, elderly and middle-aged alike, and we've all got something to add to this conversation.
Go read the op ed in its entirety. Listening to Ashwin's radio ads and hearing the buzz from party activists I know, Madia is the real deal.
Perhaps I will have to check this out for myself at the SD 41 hosted CD 3 candidate forum tomorrow in Bloomington. 2 pm, Bloomington City Council Chambers.
Friday, January 25, 2008
Star Wars Guide to the Presidential Candidates
I can't help that I saw the original Star Wars in a small theater in Mayville, North Dakota when I was a kid. I am a Star Wars geek, so I found this stuff to be a bit funny. Enjoy!
To add a dose of humor to the race. Found at KFAN.
Hillary as Lando
Here's the thing. The Millennium Falcon was hers to begin with. She only lost it to Bill on a bet. Then she got caught up in that whole Cloud City thing in the Bespin system, which proved she could govern, I guess, but she's kinda hoping you won't remember that she totally sold out the Rebels to Darth Vader. That's how J'han Solo wound up encased in Carbonite and Leia ended up in a bikini on a chain. Hmmm. Actually, not so bad! And Hillando did do some nifty piloting against the New and Improved Death Star. Didn't she also record "Caribbean Queen (No More Love On The Run)"?
Kucinich as Jar-Jar Binks
Ron Paul as Obi-Won Kenobi: "While his anti-Empire foreign policy excites the Rebel Alliance, it's pretty much a Jedi mind trick. He's still a crazy old guy living in the desert."
Huckabee as an Ewok
Obama as Leia: A young idealist constantly criticized for her "inexperience", Senator Leia Orbama once faced down Lord Vader with "Darth Vader. Only you could be so bold... and so stupid."
Romney as Luke Skywalker: Mitt's biggest appeal is that he's the likable doofus scampering around the galaxy in search of himself, always haunted by the spectre of his father. On the downside, he's so conflicted it's hard to know where his true allegiances lie... he's infatuated with his own twin sister, he listens to apparitions of old men, he preaches religious tolerance... but only for those who believe in The Force. Sort of gives the impression he's been knocked off his Tauntaun a few too many times.
Mike Gravel as Chewbacca!
Rudy Giuliani as Grand Moff Tarkin: Well, Giuliani certainly turned things around... he built the Death Star! "By the time I left office," he continues, "the Death Star was the best example of conservative government in the galaxy!" Some folks might disagree with his foreign policy, though, consisting as it does of pretty much blasting whole planets into rubble.
John Edwards as Han Solo
and
John McCain as Darth Vader: Darth McCain ultimately serves the Emperor, voting with him almost every time. McCain could be redeemed someday, but only by succumbing to Force Lightning and tossing the Emperor into a pit... something he has thus far refused to do. Let's stay in Iraq... err... Tatooine... forever!
Now, time to pop in Episode IV: The Empire Strikes Back!
To add a dose of humor to the race. Found at KFAN.
Hillary as Lando
Here's the thing. The Millennium Falcon was hers to begin with. She only lost it to Bill on a bet. Then she got caught up in that whole Cloud City thing in the Bespin system, which proved she could govern, I guess, but she's kinda hoping you won't remember that she totally sold out the Rebels to Darth Vader. That's how J'han Solo wound up encased in Carbonite and Leia ended up in a bikini on a chain. Hmmm. Actually, not so bad! And Hillando did do some nifty piloting against the New and Improved Death Star. Didn't she also record "Caribbean Queen (No More Love On The Run)"?
Kucinich as Jar-Jar Binks
Ron Paul as Obi-Won Kenobi: "While his anti-Empire foreign policy excites the Rebel Alliance, it's pretty much a Jedi mind trick. He's still a crazy old guy living in the desert."
Huckabee as an Ewok
Obama as Leia: A young idealist constantly criticized for her "inexperience", Senator Leia Orbama once faced down Lord Vader with "Darth Vader. Only you could be so bold... and so stupid."
Romney as Luke Skywalker: Mitt's biggest appeal is that he's the likable doofus scampering around the galaxy in search of himself, always haunted by the spectre of his father. On the downside, he's so conflicted it's hard to know where his true allegiances lie... he's infatuated with his own twin sister, he listens to apparitions of old men, he preaches religious tolerance... but only for those who believe in The Force. Sort of gives the impression he's been knocked off his Tauntaun a few too many times.
Mike Gravel as Chewbacca!
Rudy Giuliani as Grand Moff Tarkin: Well, Giuliani certainly turned things around... he built the Death Star! "By the time I left office," he continues, "the Death Star was the best example of conservative government in the galaxy!" Some folks might disagree with his foreign policy, though, consisting as it does of pretty much blasting whole planets into rubble.
John Edwards as Han Solo
and
John McCain as Darth Vader: Darth McCain ultimately serves the Emperor, voting with him almost every time. McCain could be redeemed someday, but only by succumbing to Force Lightning and tossing the Emperor into a pit... something he has thus far refused to do. Let's stay in Iraq... err... Tatooine... forever!
Now, time to pop in Episode IV: The Empire Strikes Back!
Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer in Buffalo!
Bluewoman and I are pretty excited about this one! We're both pretty big supporters.
Come meet Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer, candidate for US Senate, in Buffalo on Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 9:00 am at Discovery Elementary School!
Spread the word. It is a great opportunity for us to have a state-wide candidate come to our local area.
You won't want to miss the opportunity to meet Jack personally and ask him the questions that are most near and dear to your heart!
Only one week away!!!
Courageous Leadership in These Urgent Times
Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer Seeking DFL Endorsement for the U.S. Senate
Saturday, February 2nd 9:00-10:30 AM
Discovery Elementary School, 301 NE 2nd Avenue. Buffalo, MN
The Boardroom (enter through North door, room is on the left)
9:00- 9:30: Meet Jack over coffee and rolls
9:30- 10:00: Jack addresses the issues
10:00- 10:30: Questions and discussion
Come have a lively and informed discussion on key issues:
Global Warming, Building a Renewable Energy Economy, Ending The War, Reorienting our Foreign Policy, Achieving Economic Fairness & Government for All
Check out the website: www.jackforsenate.org
Jack is an independent voice, holding Republicans accountable while galvanizing Democratic vision and moral backbone!
You just have to hear him speak once to know the depth of the man and the integrity he brings. He is not your typical politician.
He is the real deal.
All are welcome with a Special Shout Out to Young Adults
Hosted by Senate District 19 DFL
Come meet Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer, candidate for US Senate, in Buffalo on Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 9:00 am at Discovery Elementary School!
Spread the word. It is a great opportunity for us to have a state-wide candidate come to our local area.
You won't want to miss the opportunity to meet Jack personally and ask him the questions that are most near and dear to your heart!
Only one week away!!!
Courageous Leadership in These Urgent Times
Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer Seeking DFL Endorsement for the U.S. Senate
Saturday, February 2nd 9:00-10:30 AM
Discovery Elementary School, 301 NE 2nd Avenue. Buffalo, MN
The Boardroom (enter through North door, room is on the left)
9:00- 9:30: Meet Jack over coffee and rolls
9:30- 10:00: Jack addresses the issues
10:00- 10:30: Questions and discussion
Come have a lively and informed discussion on key issues:
Global Warming, Building a Renewable Energy Economy, Ending The War, Reorienting our Foreign Policy, Achieving Economic Fairness & Government for All
Check out the website: www.jackforsenate.org
Jack is an independent voice, holding Republicans accountable while galvanizing Democratic vision and moral backbone!
You just have to hear him speak once to know the depth of the man and the integrity he brings. He is not your typical politician.
He is the real deal.
All are welcome with a Special Shout Out to Young Adults
Hosted by Senate District 19 DFL
Thursday, January 24, 2008
Olson confident of endorsement chances: Tinklenberg's conflicting statements
A nice story by ECM Publications.
Another thing many of us respect with Olson is that, when we send him to Congress, he will not simply "go along to get along".
The comments got interesting around the choice issue.
Lets delve into some examples of Elwyn saying something where you can misunderstand what he's saying.
On Iraq:
2005: He would have voted for the Iraq War, Tinklenberg explained, based on the information provided at the time. But Tinklenberg criticized the Bush Administration for poor planning. It's not just a matter of when the United States should pull out of Iraq but what will happen to the people left behind, he explained.
2007: “While there’s not a lot of consensus on what the path should be, they absolutely reject the idea we should do a status quo thing,” he said. Stepping back to the larger issue of preemptive war — invading a country because its deemed a threat rather than waiting to be attacked — Tinklenberg indicated he would not take such a vote. “I certainly cannot imagine a situation in which I would support the use of a preemptive military strike,” he said. “That’s one of those hypothetical things that you don’t know what in the world the conditions would be,” said Tinklenberg.
So, in 2005 he supported a preemptive invasion based on "the information available at the time" but in 2007 does not support one?
On the DFL endorsement:
11/15/07: "I supported the party's endorsed candidate before," he said of his 2006 endorsement loss to Patty Wetterling. "I will certainly do that again."
12/13/07: "We will honor the endorsement if it is an honorable and straight forward process."
Did Elwyn Tinklenberg just tell us that previous CD 6 endorsing conventions were not honorable and straight forward?
On Federal Lobbyists:
12/13/07: "We do not lobby at the Federal level." Was also said again at a recent Wright County DFL meeting.
AFSCME Screener: "I am currently president of The Tinklenberg Group, a consultancy which specializes in transportation, marketing and public relations. Among my clients was the United States Department of Transportation where I worked with the Office of the Secretary and the surface modal administrations on a review of the organization and focus of the Intelligent Transportation Systems programs of the Joint Programs Office."
Albertville Minnesota City Council Minutes:
DEPARTMENT BUSINESS ENGINEERING ENGAGEMENT OF I-94 LOBBYIST
City Administrator Kruse addressed the Council asking what their wishes were after they had a chance to hear what Mr. Tinklenberg had to share with them. Does the Council wish to go ahead with hiring Mr. Tinklenberg as a Lobbyist to represent Albertville?
Mayor Peterson feels Albertville needs to go ahead with hiring a lobbyist. Council member Fay was in favor of hiring a lobbyist but has hopes of getting some funds in return. Council member Berning was not much in favor of hiring a lobbyist at this point. Council member Vetsch was new and was hesitant on hiring a lobbyist. Council member Klecker agreed with Peterson and Fay to go ahead with hiring a lobbyist.
Council understood the need to action now because Congress is back in session if the City wants to get any financial assistance from the federal and state levels.
City Administrator Kruse wanted to clarify with City Attorney Couri how would the City draft the contract between the City of Albertville and Mr. Tinklenberg. Some discussion ensued about how to structure an agreement.
MOTION BY Mayor Peterson, seconded by Council member Fay to have staff work with Mr. Tinklenberg to outline a work plan and an agreement for Tinklenberg to Lobby for I-94 funding and report back to the January 18, 2005 Council meeting. Mayor Peterson, Council members Fay, Klecker, and Vetsch voted aye. Council member Berning voted nay. Motion carried.
Excuse me, but "Congress" and I-94 funding would seem to be a strong indicator that one were lobbying at "the Federal level".
More to follow on Tinklenberg's federal lobbying work...
Social Issues:
2005: Tinklenberg opposes legalized abortion, favors gun rights and supports a federal ban on gay marriage, provided there are some legal protections in place for gay couples. Those views are to the right of many Democrats, but could play well in the socially conservative 6th district.
and
He declared himself a Pro Life Democrat a different position on abortion than child safety advocate and Democrat Patty Wetterling ran on last election in the district. "Its (Pro Life) been my perspective since the early days of my life as a minister," said Tinklenberg.
And Ewlyn Tinklenberg, 2008 version has the nerve to call Olson "desperate" With the ever changing positions of Mr Tinklenberg, it's easy to see why delegates wonder who this guy really is!
Bob Olson sounds confident.We love confidence in our candidates!
Asked whether he was concerned that the DFL 6th District congressional endorsement convention was being held in Andover — within a few miles of the city where rival Elwyn Tinklenberg served as mayor for years — Olson waved away the geographical proximity.
“We could have it in his backyard if we want,” said Olson.
Another thing many of us respect with Olson is that, when we send him to Congress, he will not simply "go along to get along".
“Democrats elected Democrats to go to Congress to make some changes,” said Olson.
“And the Democrats have not made those changes — every Iraq funding bill George Bush wanted the Democratic Congress gave to him,” he said.
More spine needed
“Since we had a Democratic Congress there is not one less uninsured child because of people like Mrs. Bachmann and because our Democrats in Congress need more spine,” Olson said.
In answer to a reporter’s question what House Speaker Nancy Pelosi might think of his assertion, Olson gave a quick answer.
“She’d probably agree,” he said.
The comments got interesting around the choice issue.
Olson is Pro Choice
Olson looks to the issue of abortion as separating himself from his DFL rival. “I’m Pro Choice,” he said. “I respect a women’s right to privacy. I just don’t think the government should get involved,” said Olson.
His and Tinklenberg’s views are not the same, Olson maintains.“No, he’s (Tinklenberg) saying he’s ‘Pro Life,’” said Olson. “Sometimes when you listen to Elwyn, and if you listen closely, you don’t know what he meant,” said Olson.
Olson must be “a little disparate” to suggest that he is Pro Life, said Tinklenberg. “He knows better,” said Tinklenberg.
He’s not interested in seeing Roe v. Wade overturned, nor criminalizing the relationship between a woman and her doctor, said Tinklenberg. Rather, he supports education, prevention, and other tactics to reduce the number of abortions. “I believe that is ‘Pro Life,’” Tinklenberg said.
I think Elwyn was trying to call Olson "desperate". If that's the case, Elwyn Tinklenberg ought to examine his previous statements before he calls Olson "desperate".
“Sometimes when you listen to Elwyn, and if you listen closely, you don’t know what he meant." It's quite possibly a quote that is the understatement of the campaign thus far.Lets delve into some examples of Elwyn saying something where you can misunderstand what he's saying.
On Iraq:
2005: He would have voted for the Iraq War, Tinklenberg explained, based on the information provided at the time. But Tinklenberg criticized the Bush Administration for poor planning. It's not just a matter of when the United States should pull out of Iraq but what will happen to the people left behind, he explained.
2007: “While there’s not a lot of consensus on what the path should be, they absolutely reject the idea we should do a status quo thing,” he said. Stepping back to the larger issue of preemptive war — invading a country because its deemed a threat rather than waiting to be attacked — Tinklenberg indicated he would not take such a vote. “I certainly cannot imagine a situation in which I would support the use of a preemptive military strike,” he said. “That’s one of those hypothetical things that you don’t know what in the world the conditions would be,” said Tinklenberg.
So, in 2005 he supported a preemptive invasion based on "the information available at the time" but in 2007 does not support one?
On the DFL endorsement:
11/15/07: "I supported the party's endorsed candidate before," he said of his 2006 endorsement loss to Patty Wetterling. "I will certainly do that again."
12/13/07: "We will honor the endorsement if it is an honorable and straight forward process."
Did Elwyn Tinklenberg just tell us that previous CD 6 endorsing conventions were not honorable and straight forward?
On Federal Lobbyists:
12/13/07: "We do not lobby at the Federal level." Was also said again at a recent Wright County DFL meeting.
AFSCME Screener: "I am currently president of The Tinklenberg Group, a consultancy which specializes in transportation, marketing and public relations. Among my clients was the United States Department of Transportation where I worked with the Office of the Secretary and the surface modal administrations on a review of the organization and focus of the Intelligent Transportation Systems programs of the Joint Programs Office."
Albertville Minnesota City Council Minutes:
DEPARTMENT BUSINESS ENGINEERING ENGAGEMENT OF I-94 LOBBYIST
City Administrator Kruse addressed the Council asking what their wishes were after they had a chance to hear what Mr. Tinklenberg had to share with them. Does the Council wish to go ahead with hiring Mr. Tinklenberg as a Lobbyist to represent Albertville?
Mayor Peterson feels Albertville needs to go ahead with hiring a lobbyist. Council member Fay was in favor of hiring a lobbyist but has hopes of getting some funds in return. Council member Berning was not much in favor of hiring a lobbyist at this point. Council member Vetsch was new and was hesitant on hiring a lobbyist. Council member Klecker agreed with Peterson and Fay to go ahead with hiring a lobbyist.
Council understood the need to action now because Congress is back in session if the City wants to get any financial assistance from the federal and state levels.
City Administrator Kruse wanted to clarify with City Attorney Couri how would the City draft the contract between the City of Albertville and Mr. Tinklenberg. Some discussion ensued about how to structure an agreement.
MOTION BY Mayor Peterson, seconded by Council member Fay to have staff work with Mr. Tinklenberg to outline a work plan and an agreement for Tinklenberg to Lobby for I-94 funding and report back to the January 18, 2005 Council meeting. Mayor Peterson, Council members Fay, Klecker, and Vetsch voted aye. Council member Berning voted nay. Motion carried.
Excuse me, but "Congress" and I-94 funding would seem to be a strong indicator that one were lobbying at "the Federal level".
More to follow on Tinklenberg's federal lobbying work...
Social Issues:
2005: Tinklenberg opposes legalized abortion, favors gun rights and supports a federal ban on gay marriage, provided there are some legal protections in place for gay couples. Those views are to the right of many Democrats, but could play well in the socially conservative 6th district.
and
He declared himself a Pro Life Democrat a different position on abortion than child safety advocate and Democrat Patty Wetterling ran on last election in the district. "Its (Pro Life) been my perspective since the early days of my life as a minister," said Tinklenberg.
And Ewlyn Tinklenberg, 2008 version has the nerve to call Olson "desperate" With the ever changing positions of Mr Tinklenberg, it's easy to see why delegates wonder who this guy really is!
Bob Olson live blog at Minnesota Monitor! Update
Check out Bob Olson blogging live at Minnesota Monitor tonight at 6:30! Check this stuff out!!!
*Update*
Bob is kickin ass so far!!!
Muse: Bob, How do you feel your campaign will do amongst independent voters? In what ways would a Bob Olson candidacy appeal to those people in the middle?
Bob: Michele Bachmann only received 50.04 percent of the vote in 2006. Hardly a mandate and that was before people outside her old state Senate district knew a lot about her.
I think independent voters are looking for a new direction. This is a change year.
Michele Bachmann has spent the last 8 years trying to scare and divide voters. I've been in the business world working on the big issues affecting our economy -- home ownership, higher education, health care, energy. I think people will see the distinction.
Education question:
Muse: As an educator I am concerned about the addition of Julie Quist of Edwatch to the Bachmann team. How will you effectively defend public education against this organization? Also, what is the biggest difference between yourself and Michele Bachmann on education issues?
Bob: Thanks for your work in education. I've always said that the Middle Class in this country was built on two things: the labor movement and strong public education.
That Mrs. Bachmann is bringing extreme elements into her office is no surprise to anyone who has studied her career.
I believe local, state and federal government has a vested interest in supporting public education. The best I can tell, Mrs. Bachmann does not.
The reason I'm able to run for Congress today is because of the strong start I got in life as a public school student.
*Update*
Bob is kickin ass so far!!!
Muse: Bob, How do you feel your campaign will do amongst independent voters? In what ways would a Bob Olson candidacy appeal to those people in the middle?
Bob: Michele Bachmann only received 50.04 percent of the vote in 2006. Hardly a mandate and that was before people outside her old state Senate district knew a lot about her.
I think independent voters are looking for a new direction. This is a change year.
Michele Bachmann has spent the last 8 years trying to scare and divide voters. I've been in the business world working on the big issues affecting our economy -- home ownership, higher education, health care, energy. I think people will see the distinction.
Education question:
Muse: As an educator I am concerned about the addition of Julie Quist of Edwatch to the Bachmann team. How will you effectively defend public education against this organization? Also, what is the biggest difference between yourself and Michele Bachmann on education issues?
Bob: Thanks for your work in education. I've always said that the Middle Class in this country was built on two things: the labor movement and strong public education.
That Mrs. Bachmann is bringing extreme elements into her office is no surprise to anyone who has studied her career.
I believe local, state and federal government has a vested interest in supporting public education. The best I can tell, Mrs. Bachmann does not.
The reason I'm able to run for Congress today is because of the strong start I got in life as a public school student.
Both Tinklenberg and Molnau failed MnDOT
The SC Times editorial board ran an op ed this morning about MnDOT's need for a "fiscal reality check".
To be clear, they do not specifically call out Mr Tinklenberg. However, the time frame in which the audits were performed and the issues at hand clearly point to Tinklenberg as well.
Tinklenberg was MnDOT Commissioner from 1999-October 2002. The Startribune actually ran a series in 2003 that highlighted these problems in MnDOT.
The series does not reflect kindly on Tinklenberg's time as MnDOT Commissioner. Pawlenty and Molnau are also quoted as working to bring more accountability to MnDOT under their leadership.
The reality is that Pawlenty, Molnau, and Tinklenberg have failed Minnesotan's.
Here are the links to the MnDOT series, read them for yourself.
Part I
Part II
Part III
Part IV
Part V
The SC Times editorial continues.
Tinklenberg's non-competitive bid contracts seem to have been commonplace in Molnau's administration as well.
It will be interesting to see if SEH, one of the companies that received a non-competitive bid contract, who also works closely with the Tinklenberg Group now, contributed to Molnau's campaign coffers just as they did with Tinklenberg's.
We know it happened in 2006. I'm anxiously awaiting his first FEC report of 2008.
Is it possible that Molnau will keep her post at MnDOT because the anointed DFL candidate in the 6th has been proven equally as inept?
Why the harsh scrutiny of Tinklenberg's record?
First of all, we must vet our candidates. If some no name blogger who works 5o+ hours a week at 2 jobs can figure this stuff out with google and yahoo searches, a highly paid right wing political operative probably already has this stuff.
Do you really want this race to be over by August 2008?
Do you want the Republicans pulling their money out of the 6th because Bachmann has a 25 point lead over a scandal ridden Elwyn Tinklenberg, pouring money into the 1st, 2nd and 3rd CD's to defeat Walz and hold the other GOP seats?
I, for one, refuse to bury my head in the sand and ignore the past.
To be clear, they do not specifically call out Mr Tinklenberg. However, the time frame in which the audits were performed and the issues at hand clearly point to Tinklenberg as well.
The panel's main objectives are simple. First, make sure there are policies and procedures in place that foster efficiency, competency, accountability and the wise use of the public's money. Second, make sure all MnDOT staffers are following those policies and procedures.
While MnDOT and its leader, Lt. Gov. Carol Molnau, have come under pressure in the wake of the Interstate Highway 35W bridge collapse, our call for this intense scrutiny and potentially massive reforms is rooted more in the findings of an internal MnDOT audit reported Jan. 20 by the Star Tribune.
The audit revealed that since 1999, MnDOT professional staffers have approved cost overruns for projects totaling at least $140 million.
Tinklenberg was MnDOT Commissioner from 1999-October 2002. The Startribune actually ran a series in 2003 that highlighted these problems in MnDOT.
The series does not reflect kindly on Tinklenberg's time as MnDOT Commissioner. Pawlenty and Molnau are also quoted as working to bring more accountability to MnDOT under their leadership.
The reality is that Pawlenty, Molnau, and Tinklenberg have failed Minnesotan's.
Here are the links to the MnDOT series, read them for yourself.
Part I
Part II
Part III
Part IV
Part V
The SC Times editorial continues.
Couple that attitude with two paragraphs from the Star Tribune report and Minnesotans have all the reasons needed to put MnDOT under a microscope:
"The 2007 audit ... attributes the problem to ineffective management and insufficient controls. It found that MnDOT managers have often expanded construction contracts without written justification or itemization, a violation of state contract regulations. ...
"The audit, which reviewed projects from 1999 through mid-2006, shows that contractors and consultants are increasingly being paid millions beyond their original bids at a time when the agency is delaying many projects because of a lack of funding — $85 million short this fiscal year alone."
Tinklenberg's non-competitive bid contracts seem to have been commonplace in Molnau's administration as well.
It will be interesting to see if SEH, one of the companies that received a non-competitive bid contract, who also works closely with the Tinklenberg Group now, contributed to Molnau's campaign coffers just as they did with Tinklenberg's.
We know it happened in 2006. I'm anxiously awaiting his first FEC report of 2008.
Is it possible that Molnau will keep her post at MnDOT because the anointed DFL candidate in the 6th has been proven equally as inept?
Why the harsh scrutiny of Tinklenberg's record?
First of all, we must vet our candidates. If some no name blogger who works 5o+ hours a week at 2 jobs can figure this stuff out with google and yahoo searches, a highly paid right wing political operative probably already has this stuff.
Republican Party of Minnesota Communications Director Michael Brodkorb said Republicans look forward to an examination and discussion of Elwyn Tinklenberg's record as Commissioner of Transportation and as a lobbyist. (Emphasis added)
Do you really want this race to be over by August 2008?
Do you want the Republicans pulling their money out of the 6th because Bachmann has a 25 point lead over a scandal ridden Elwyn Tinklenberg, pouring money into the 1st, 2nd and 3rd CD's to defeat Walz and hold the other GOP seats?
I, for one, refuse to bury my head in the sand and ignore the past.
Wednesday, January 23, 2008
Olson comments on Bush Administration's 935 lies
Olson: Congress Should Have Confronted Bush on 'Cycle of Lies'
For Immediate Release
Contact: Christopher Truscott
ANOKA—Bob Olson, a DFL candidate in the 6th Congressional District, released the following statement in response to a report that the Bush administration made at least 935 inaccurate statements about Iraq in the two years following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
"Because too many politicians were unwilling to stand up to this administration and its endless cycle of lies, we've lost 3,931 troops and hundreds of billions of dollars in a war we never should have started.
"I am the only candidate of either party in the 6th District race who opposed this war from the very beginning. To go after Saddam Hussein and Iraq after 9/11 made as much sense to me as attacking India after the bombing of Pearl Harbor. This war has been a wasteful distraction in the real war on terrorism.
"As your congressman, I will never cave in the face of unnecessary warmongering by any president, regardless of his or her party. If political courage costs me an election, that's fine. At least I'll be able to sleep at night."
For Immediate Release
Contact: Christopher Truscott
ANOKA—Bob Olson, a DFL candidate in the 6th Congressional District, released the following statement in response to a report that the Bush administration made at least 935 inaccurate statements about Iraq in the two years following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
"Because too many politicians were unwilling to stand up to this administration and its endless cycle of lies, we've lost 3,931 troops and hundreds of billions of dollars in a war we never should have started.
"I am the only candidate of either party in the 6th District race who opposed this war from the very beginning. To go after Saddam Hussein and Iraq after 9/11 made as much sense to me as attacking India after the bombing of Pearl Harbor. This war has been a wasteful distraction in the real war on terrorism.
"As your congressman, I will never cave in the face of unnecessary warmongering by any president, regardless of his or her party. If political courage costs me an election, that's fine. At least I'll be able to sleep at night."
Seifert spews more rhetoric
Growth and Justice has an interesting post up about some of the comments made by one of our favorite legislators, Marty Seifert.
In fact, I think he spewed the same rhetoric cited by Growth and Justice, at the Ridgewater College Forum in Hutchinson, minus the wagon comments.
Charlie Quimby makes a great argument against Seiferts comments.
Seifert ought to know that small businesses are the state's largest employers...most likely due to the fact that Minnesota has grown 32% since 1972, from about 3.8 million to around 5.1 million.
Anyway, I'm looking forward to Quimby's future posts on the "big government riding the wagon" fairy tale. I'm sure we have not heard this Seifert story for the last time...
In fact, I think he spewed the same rhetoric cited by Growth and Justice, at the Ridgewater College Forum in Hutchinson, minus the wagon comments.
Seifert said in 1972 the top three job providers in the state of Minnesota were 3M, Honeywell and Dayton-Hudson.
They were big companies that provide good benefits to their employees and families.
"Today three of the top five employers in the state are State of Minnesota, the University of Minnesota and federal government," Seifert said. "I don't know about you, but that is getting to be a little bit scary in terms of fewer and fewer job providers because o[f] more and more regulations and taxes."
Charlie Quimby makes a great argument against Seiferts comments.
It's plain misleading to imply with the example that big private employers have been displaced by big government. Or that government is the cause of the real pain being felt today by low- and middle-income families.
The Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development publishes comprehensive employment statistics going back to 1990. In that year, government employment was 16.2 percent of the total. In 2007, it was 15.5 percent. I examined the 17-year trends line for private jobs growth vs. growth for federal, state and local jobs in Minnesota.
Seifert ought to know that small businesses are the state's largest employers...most likely due to the fact that Minnesota has grown 32% since 1972, from about 3.8 million to around 5.1 million.
Anyway, I'm looking forward to Quimby's future posts on the "big government riding the wagon" fairy tale. I'm sure we have not heard this Seifert story for the last time...
DFL candidates in CD 2 and CD 6 speak out!
DFL Party, Congressional Candidates Denounce Bachmann and Kline's Votes to Uphold Bush's SCHIP Veto
St. Paul, MN (January 23, 2008) Representatives Michele Bachmann and John Kline voted today for the fifth time to deny 30,000 uninsured Minnesota children access to affordable healthcare, by voting to uphold President Bush's second veto of the renewal and expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP).
In response, the four candidates for DFL endorsement in the Second and Sixth Congressional Districts joined with the DFL Party to denounce Bachmann and Kline for consistently putting the Republican Party line before the needs of Minnesota families.
"Michele Bachmann has proven that her out-of-touch and mean-spirited agenda has no room for working families," said Sixth Congressional District DFL candidate Bob Olson. "That she continues to put the president's political demands ahead of the needs of poor children is absolutely shameful."
Dan Powers, who is running as a DFLer in the Second District said, "Once again partisan politics comes before children. When will our children matter enough for the Republicans? Programs like an expanded SCHIP can really make a positive difference for families in the long term. Kline's fifth vote against it is one more reason to vote for change in the Second District."
"Good people in our country disagree about exactly how to fix our country's broken healthcare system," said Steve Sarvi, Second District DFL candidate. "But most Americans agree that we should be able to take care of our children. By voting not to override President Bush's veto, Representative Kline has once again failed to act in the interest of the people he is supposed to represent. The Second District simply can't handle another two years without an advocate in Congress."
"It's a sad day when Republicans block a much-needed initiative for millions of families who are experiencing the reality of the healthcare crisis in America," said Sixth Congressional District DFL candidate Elwyn Tinklenberg. "Michele Bachmann voted to uphold the president's veto despite her claim to support 'family values.' For her, supporting the president meant abandoning our children."
"Minnesotans are ready for change — they are ready for real leadership that puts our children and families first," said Minnesota DFL Chair Brian Melendez. "But Michele Bachmann and John Kline just don't get it: over and over again they've put corporate special interests and blind partisanship ahead of the interests of Minnesota children and families."
St. Paul, MN (January 23, 2008) Representatives Michele Bachmann and John Kline voted today for the fifth time to deny 30,000 uninsured Minnesota children access to affordable healthcare, by voting to uphold President Bush's second veto of the renewal and expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP).
In response, the four candidates for DFL endorsement in the Second and Sixth Congressional Districts joined with the DFL Party to denounce Bachmann and Kline for consistently putting the Republican Party line before the needs of Minnesota families.
"Michele Bachmann has proven that her out-of-touch and mean-spirited agenda has no room for working families," said Sixth Congressional District DFL candidate Bob Olson. "That she continues to put the president's political demands ahead of the needs of poor children is absolutely shameful."
Dan Powers, who is running as a DFLer in the Second District said, "Once again partisan politics comes before children. When will our children matter enough for the Republicans? Programs like an expanded SCHIP can really make a positive difference for families in the long term. Kline's fifth vote against it is one more reason to vote for change in the Second District."
"Good people in our country disagree about exactly how to fix our country's broken healthcare system," said Steve Sarvi, Second District DFL candidate. "But most Americans agree that we should be able to take care of our children. By voting not to override President Bush's veto, Representative Kline has once again failed to act in the interest of the people he is supposed to represent. The Second District simply can't handle another two years without an advocate in Congress."
"It's a sad day when Republicans block a much-needed initiative for millions of families who are experiencing the reality of the healthcare crisis in America," said Sixth Congressional District DFL candidate Elwyn Tinklenberg. "Michele Bachmann voted to uphold the president's veto despite her claim to support 'family values.' For her, supporting the president meant abandoning our children."
"Minnesotans are ready for change — they are ready for real leadership that puts our children and families first," said Minnesota DFL Chair Brian Melendez. "But Michele Bachmann and John Kline just don't get it: over and over again they've put corporate special interests and blind partisanship ahead of the interests of Minnesota children and families."
More Tinklenberg website woes
Big E at MN Blue takes a look at the "new" Tinklenberg 2008 site.
Big E, at least they fixed "Michele" on the front page press release! That only took 3 days to go from "Michelle" to "Michele".
Dump Bachmann takes them to task for their web hosting. They are right. Look for the site and it comes up with a pretty strange domain name, 0062b7c.netsolhost.com/.
Is fund raising that bad? Looks like with their recent website changes, they have gone from bad to worse.
While not website related, Political Muse has another Olson piece up as well!
If this were the NFL, I'd have been flagged a week ago for excessive celebration...but what can I say, I am excited for the progress Olson is continuing to make. I agree with Muse. Olson has had a great week. Great radio interviews on both AM 950 and KRWC, AM 1360 in Buffalo, some great exposure from other blogs, and a rumor of a Startribune story in the works.
Olson is starting to hit his stride. With the great organization he has behind him and a strong grassroots effort, Olson is well positioned for success in November 08.
Big E, at least they fixed "Michele" on the front page press release! That only took 3 days to go from "Michelle" to "Michele".
Dump Bachmann takes them to task for their web hosting. They are right. Look for the site and it comes up with a pretty strange domain name, 0062b7c.netsolhost.com/.
Is fund raising that bad? Looks like with their recent website changes, they have gone from bad to worse.
While not website related, Political Muse has another Olson piece up as well!
If this were the NFL, I'd have been flagged a week ago for excessive celebration...but what can I say, I am excited for the progress Olson is continuing to make. I agree with Muse. Olson has had a great week. Great radio interviews on both AM 950 and KRWC, AM 1360 in Buffalo, some great exposure from other blogs, and a rumor of a Startribune story in the works.
Olson is starting to hit his stride. With the great organization he has behind him and a strong grassroots effort, Olson is well positioned for success in November 08.
935 false statements on our way to war...
The Center for Public Integrity published a report on the false statements used by the Bush Administration on our road to war in Iraq.
The study accounted for 935 false statements in a 2 year period of time and that over this two year period of time, Bush and his cronies cited "Weapons of Mass Destruction" 532 times in speeches.
Incredible.
Think about that, for each time President Bush and his cronies uttered "Weapons of Mass Destruction" and other lies, 4 of our service members died, years later!
I'll never forget the quote I read at Armyofdude...
"Sometime this year, an eighteen year old soldier will die in a war that started when he was thirteen."
How can Michele Bachmann continue to support President Bush's flawed Iraq plan when it's based on 935 lies?
How could Elwyn Tinklenberg state that he supported the Iraq War, "based on the information available at the time"?
The study accounted for 935 false statements in a 2 year period of time and that over this two year period of time, Bush and his cronies cited "Weapons of Mass Destruction" 532 times in speeches.
Incredible.
Named in the study along with Bush were top officials of the administration during the period studied: Vice President Dick Cheney, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of State Colin Powell, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and White House press secretaries Ari Fleischer and Scott McClellan.
Bush led with 259 false statements, 231 about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and 28 about Iraq's links to al-Qaida, the study found. That was second only to Powell's 244 false statements about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and 10 about Iraq and al-Qaida.
Think about that, for each time President Bush and his cronies uttered "Weapons of Mass Destruction" and other lies, 4 of our service members died, years later!
I'll never forget the quote I read at Armyofdude...
"Sometime this year, an eighteen year old soldier will die in a war that started when he was thirteen."
How can Michele Bachmann continue to support President Bush's flawed Iraq plan when it's based on 935 lies?
How could Elwyn Tinklenberg state that he supported the Iraq War, "based on the information available at the time"?
Vote Vets Email, helping Madia!
Dear VoteVets.org Supporter,
There's been a lot of talk about the 2008 elections, and I'm sure your email box is full of appeals, but please give this one a read. I'll make it brief.
Two of the best shots we have at electing Iraq and Afghanistan veterans to Congress come in Maine and Minnesota, where Iraq veteran Adam Cote is running for Maine's first district, and Iraq veteran Ashwin Madia is running for Minnesota's 3rd. But, to get there, they need your help.
CLICK HERE TO HELP ADAM COTE AND ASHWIN MADIA FOR CONGRESS
Both of these 21st Century Patriots will help dramatically change the face of Congress for the better. In a campaign season where you hear about a bunch of multi-million dollar bank accounts, and wonder if your contribution really matters, I can tell you that in these two races, every single penny counts - a lot.
Here are the types of Congressmen you will help elect by making a donation now:
In 2004 and 2005, Adam Cote served in Iraq as a platoon leader with Maine's 133rd Engineer Battalion. He led over 100 convoys in Iraq and was in charge of many reconstruction efforts, including building schools and medical clinics. Moved by the extreme poverty and deprivation in Iraq, Adam also took it upon himself to do more. He created and spearheaded the "Adopt an Iraqi Village" program, which distributes school supplies and other items to destitute Iraqis.
Ashwin Madia, the child of immigrants, served in Iraq from September 2005 to March 2006. While stationed in Baghdad, he worked with Iraqi judicial officers, U.S. military and civilian officials, and representatives of the European Union and United Nations to strengthen the Iraqi criminal justice system. He also briefed top U.S. generals on the status of the rule of law in the country.
This is the type of unique and personal experience in the war that is desperately needed on Capitol Hill. Help make it a reality.
DONATE HERE TO HELP ADAM COTE AND ASHWIN MADIA FOR CONGRESS
Sincerely,
Jon SoltzIraq War VeteranChairman, VoteVets.org
There's been a lot of talk about the 2008 elections, and I'm sure your email box is full of appeals, but please give this one a read. I'll make it brief.
Two of the best shots we have at electing Iraq and Afghanistan veterans to Congress come in Maine and Minnesota, where Iraq veteran Adam Cote is running for Maine's first district, and Iraq veteran Ashwin Madia is running for Minnesota's 3rd. But, to get there, they need your help.
CLICK HERE TO HELP ADAM COTE AND ASHWIN MADIA FOR CONGRESS
Both of these 21st Century Patriots will help dramatically change the face of Congress for the better. In a campaign season where you hear about a bunch of multi-million dollar bank accounts, and wonder if your contribution really matters, I can tell you that in these two races, every single penny counts - a lot.
Here are the types of Congressmen you will help elect by making a donation now:
In 2004 and 2005, Adam Cote served in Iraq as a platoon leader with Maine's 133rd Engineer Battalion. He led over 100 convoys in Iraq and was in charge of many reconstruction efforts, including building schools and medical clinics. Moved by the extreme poverty and deprivation in Iraq, Adam also took it upon himself to do more. He created and spearheaded the "Adopt an Iraqi Village" program, which distributes school supplies and other items to destitute Iraqis.
Ashwin Madia, the child of immigrants, served in Iraq from September 2005 to March 2006. While stationed in Baghdad, he worked with Iraqi judicial officers, U.S. military and civilian officials, and representatives of the European Union and United Nations to strengthen the Iraqi criminal justice system. He also briefed top U.S. generals on the status of the rule of law in the country.
This is the type of unique and personal experience in the war that is desperately needed on Capitol Hill. Help make it a reality.
DONATE HERE TO HELP ADAM COTE AND ASHWIN MADIA FOR CONGRESS
Sincerely,
Jon SoltzIraq War VeteranChairman, VoteVets.org
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)