Showing posts with label morality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label morality. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Senator Newman: Politics at its worst

Yesterday Sally Jo Sorensen at Bluestem Prairie broke a story about Senator Scott Newman and his refusal to meet with organizations and people that endorsed my candidacy for the State Senate.

When I first heard about Senator Newman's refusal to meet with "any organizations that donated to/supported his opponent Hal Kimball."
-----Original Message-----
From: Kim Kelley [email address redacted by Bluestem]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 2:00 PM
To: Eileen Gavin
Subject: [Eileen Gavin] Meeting

 Kim Kelley sent a message using the contact form at [redacted]

Hi Eileen-

Unfortunately, Senator Newman will not see any organizations that donated to/supported his opponent Hal Kimball. After some careful checking, I discovered that the MNA had donated to Kimball's campaign. Your association will be unable to schedule an appointment with Senator Newman.

Kim Kelley

Legislative Assistant
My first reaction was surprise.  Really?  Senator Newman won't meet with local Vietnam Veterans, college students, local farmers, school teachers, Racino supporters, local laborers, local nurses, etc?

Absurd!

My initial shock wore off quickly.  During my time with the Minnesota State University Student Association, I worked with higher education groups across the state.  We worked to set up meetings with legislators in a strong effort to "Freeze Tuition".  We met with virtually every State Representative and Senator, except then Representative Newman.  I literally chased him from the House chambers to his office in the State Office Building trying to talk to him about higher education issues.  It didn't matter...Representative Newman didn't want to talk to us.

Now, he wants to know who you voted for and who you gave money to before he talks to you.  Per an email to the Minnesota Nurses Association, Senator Newman refuses to meet with them because they endorsed my candidacy for the State Senate.  They incorrectly assert that the MNA provided my campaign with much needed funding.  Per our campaign finance board reports, they did not, despite what Senator Newman's Legislative Assistant Kim Kelley thinks she found.

The Senator Newman excuse generator will talk about how negative the campaigns got as the election neared.  Truth be told, Candidate Newman worked to manipulate local debates and forums.  Besides, anything we brought to the voters was something Candidate Newman said.  Was he upset that we were calling him out on it or upset that he actually said some of the things he said?

On second glance it sure looks like a reverse "pay to play scheme".  Simply put, this is politics at its worst.  It's why people have a complete distrust in government.

What will happen to towns like Annandale, Litchfield, Grove City, Watkins and Eden Valley, towns that didn't strongly support Senator Newman?  Will they receive bigger LGA cuts?

What about mayors, council members, county commissioners, etc that supported our campaign?

Four years ago I lost a race to Senator Steve Dille.  Within weeks of the session opening I met with the Senator to discuss some higher education and Veterans issues.  Senator Dille provided a personal tour of the State Capitol and Senate chambers and we kept in close contact talking about these very important issues.  He had an open door for everyone.


Senator Newman...his door has a toll, if you gave to our campaign in 2010, you better give to him in 2012 or else.  Politics at its worst, right before our eyes.

I hope a ethics investigation ensues...

Sunday, June 08, 2008

More from Ed Schultz on Norm Coleman's Morality

From Friday's Ed Schultz Show:

"Now, if this continues, if this slime attack on Al Franken continues, Norm Coleman needs to know that I don't like him."

"And Norm Coleman needs to know that I have Ed Heads all over Minnesota."

"And Norm Coleman needs to know that I will seek out women who have been hit on by Norm Coleman."

"I will play dirty Norm, if you keep playing dirty on my brother Al."

"I'm so glad you brought up Norm Coleman's skirt chasing. I have an acquaintance in her early 20's, gorgeous and well endowed, and Norm tried to pick her up and a friend in a local bar, he's absolutely slimy."

"Oooo hooo. Oh, I love that stuff. I'll be the lefty pit bull who takes down Norm. Just give me the material. Give me a phone number. Let's get it on."

Ed Schultz Calls Norm Coleman A Skirt Chaser?

From the 3rd Hour of the June 6, 2008 show.

On the Al Franken scandals:
"This is all to just lather up the right, to shake down the Democrats, to make Norm Coleman look like he's an altar boy, which he is not. And that is a story that the right wing media in Minnesota will never do. You know, Norm likes to chase the skirt, you know, there's no doubt about that. Anybody wanna counter me on that? Anybody in the media want to write an editorial about what an altar boy Norm Coleman is? Any right wing talkers in Minnesota want to tell us what an upstanding, wonderful, highly moral guy Norm Coleman is? Come on! Let's get it on!"

Schultz spent significant time in the 3rd hour of his show on Friday coming to the defense of Al Franken.

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Interesting Lobbyist Story

Non-Tinklenberg related for those wondering....

Raw Story has a story up, post State of the Union Address, on the impact on Federal Lobbying.
Trouble has been building for earmark lobbyists for years since separate scandals involving earmark improprieties sent lobbyist Jack Abramoff and former Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham (R-CA) to jail.

The crackdown on targeted spending projects secreted into appropriations bills seems to be reaching a head, and one lobbyist told Roll Call the industry is "pretty close" to a crisis.

A crisis in the lobbying industry? Perhaps that's why the economy is, well, headed for a recession.

I have an idea, why don't we just elect lobbyists to the House and Senate and eliminate the need for the "middle guy"?

The "good ones" don't seem to be worried though.
"Ironically, the more they raise the bar, the more folks like us who are really good are valued," lobbyist Rich Gold told Newmyer. Gold heads the lobbying practice at Holland & Knight, where he said business has grown at least 10 percent for the last two years.

"...folks like us who are really good" heh?

Me thinks there is a fine line between very good and having the key's to the Congresspersons front door.

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

Breaking around the District

Soldiers from Litchfield and surrounding communities are deploying to Iraq...again. Governor Pawlenty will most likely make his way out into the flyover areas to wish our troops the best.

I bet Urdahl keeps him off of County Road 22, too many potholes for the Governor. He'll stick to Highway 12.

Glencoe is losing some jobs. 25 jobs are expected to leave. It also follows job reductions at Starkey Labs and Bosch-Telex Communications.

The biggest economic hit will be felt in Hutchinson though. Hutchinson Technology is laying off 500 workers, 225 in the Hutchinson facility.

If you travel through small town Greater Minnesota, stop to check out the abundance of vacancy's in Howard Lake, Dassel, Cokato, Glencoe, Stewart, and Brownton.

Our rural economies are slowly but surely dying...and some seem to think our elected leaders are doing a great job in St Paul.

Although Mr. Glennie tends to write from a conservative side, I do enjoy his writings, his opinion and do side with him from time to time.

I do not on this instance.
Freshman House member Ron Shimanski, R-Silver Lake, did exactly what was
expected of a minority member of the Minnesota House of Representatives - he
voted party line and stood behind Gov. Tim Pawlenty, also a Republican, as the
governor vetoed bill after bill placed on his desk.

Shimanski made no bones about it. He was there to support the governor to
ensure that the large DFL majorities in both the House and Senate could not
override those vetoes without support of some Republican legislators. He was not
going to be one of them.


Wow. Shimanski joined the ranks of his tag team Rep in SD 18 and put politics before the people. Shimanski's duty, as an elected leader, was to support his constituents first, his party and Governor second. Clearly he has put his party and his political future before the people.

A LTE in the Dassel Cokato Enterprise Dispatch also caught my eye this week.

His commentary centered around the debate of the "separation of church and state". While the retired pastor commented on the passing of Jerry Falwell he also makes a very distinct point, as a retired Lutheran pastor.
The pulpit should be for proclaiming the Word of God. Never should a minister
use the pulpit to support a political candidate or party.

Concise and well said!

Speaking of religion and politics, Congresswoman Bachmann had a LTE in the Annandale Advocate as well.
We can continue our steadfast support for the men and women whose lives are in
danger as well as those who have returned home after long tours abroad -
soldiers who fought to keep us safe today as well as in years past - by keeping
the promises we've made to them: by providing them with the benefits to which
they are entitled in the years following service - all priorities of Congress
this year.

Perhaps Katherine Kersten and Congresswoman Bachmann should get on the same sheet of music!

Friday, March 23, 2007

Tony Snow: Flip Flopper

I heard these quotes yesterday while I was trekking across the Twin Cities, I am glad that Think Progress has picked up on this.

When Democrats control Congress

There’s another principle, which is Congress doesn’t have the legislative — I mean oversight authority over the White House. [CNN, 3/22/07]
First, the White House is under no compulsion to do anything. The legislative branch
doesn’t have oversight. [MSNBC, 3/22/07]
Congress doesn’t have any legitimate oversight and responsibilities to the White House. [Fox, 3/22/07]

When Republican's controlled Congress


QUESTION: What is the president’s opinion of a request by Republican leaders in the House to launch an investigation of Sandy Berger’s involvement in the removal of classified documents from the National Archives?


SNOW: There were questions last week, about investigations involving Republican members. Members of Congress have their own oversight obligations. They may proceed as they wish. They’re a separate and co-equal branch of government and I’m not going to tell them what they can and can’t do. [Briefing, 10/16/06]



The 08 elections cannot come quick enough...

Military sexual assaults up!

Up 24% in 2006.

The Army attributes the increase to new reporting programs and not an actual increase in crimes.

I say bullshit.

I have had former soldiers tell me stories about sexual assaults in Kuwait and Iraq. We also know that these crimes are vastly under reported, regardless of the reporting mechanism. They are especially difficult to report in the cases of command rape and abuses in military authority.

It's another significant reason this war in Iraq is horrendous. Our men and women fighting this war deserve better.

More to follow on this story and the underlying issues...

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Strib support the troops LTE

Exposing yet another issue...body armor, health care, longer deployments, now their pay?

Who am I kidding, pay has been an issue for quite some time as well!

pay cuts for the guard

Where's the support?

As a soldier in one of the Minnesota National Guard units assigned to return to Kosovo, it is disappointing to hear about the loss of our combat pay, imminent danger pay and tax-free pay status once in country (Star Tribune, March 8).

I'm not complaining about being deployed. My last trip there filled me with a great sense of accomplishment and pride. The pay I received last time was enough to ease the pain in pocketbook from being deployed. I'll be losing quite a bit of money this time around. As a member of the volunteer, professional army, the pay is one of the reasons I enlisted in the first place.

Thanks again, Washington, for "supporting the troops."

ROBB LUTZ, ST. PAUL

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Mail Call! (Focus on the Family related)

So, I got a fundraising letter today. It happens. I am on a lot of lists.

But why did I get one from Focus on the Family?

Dear Harold,


A warm greeting to you and your loved ones from all of us here at Focus on the Family. "Warm" might not be an entirely appropriate term, however, as this has been one of the coldest and snowiest winters in recent memory. We assure you, we've seen no evidence of "global warming" in our neck of the woods. Happily, spring is just around the corner, and we in Colorado look forward to its arrival with anticipation.

Oh so witty with the "global warming" comments.

Although we're tremendously grateful for the many friends who have supported us faithfully and sacrificially in recent months, and especially during the Christmas season, we regret to report that Focus' income is several million dollars below anticipated projections, which creates understandable tension in the support of on going programs.

So, attacking a State Senate campaign, ours, was not the financial boom they expected heh.

Are they fundraising for more hate mongering programing like this?




No wonder they need more money. It takes a lot of small fingers to make and hold great signage like this.

It goes without saying that if trends continue, we will have no choice but to scale back on some of our family strengthening projects and initiatives.

Sorry Dr. James Dobson, I don't think you'll be getting any money from me, especially after the nice mailing FoF sent in the district attacking me and other progressives.

Pace's commentary on homosexuality

As we all know, General Pace, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that homosexuality is "immoral".

While I do not subscribe to that sort of thought, he can think what he wants on a personal level.

However, as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he is to uphold the rules and regulations of the military and answers to the President.
Gen. John Shalikashvili (Ret.), recently called for the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell, writing, "We must welcome the service of any American who is willing and able to do the job."

Exactly. Soldiers in the GLBT community have died in Iraq. They get wounded just the same. Do you think a soldier considers another soldiers sexual preference when an IED needs to be safely exploded, or a life saving tourniquet is placed on a missing limb? Of course not.

I see Pace's comments as shifting the discussion from Walter Reed and the care of our Veterans and soldiers, to another issue to obfuscate the public.

Regardless of the comments made by General Pace, I wish he had came out in such a strong and vulgar manner when dealing with the Walter Reed Scandal.

The treatment of our Veterans and soldiers has been immoral on many fronts.

Monday, March 12, 2007

Bush and Cheney's VA Budget

VP Dick Cheney. "Anyone can say they support the troops and we should take them at their word, but the proof will come when it's time to provide the money," he said.

A budget that failed to support the troops.

Bush Administration's Budget Request By the Numbers
The following numbers are estimates of the consequences of enacting President Bush's Fiscal Year 2006 budget proposal. [Sources: VFW Press Release, Department of Veterans Affairs, President's Fiscal Year 2006 Budget]

Veterans who would stop receiving hospital treatment for their disabilities: 220,000

Veterans losing out on long-term nursing home care: 28,000

VA health care workers eliminated: over 3,000

Veterans benefits staff positions cut: over 700

Priority 8 Veterans denied VA enrollment between Jan. 14, 2003 and the end of Fiscal Year 2006: 522,000

Medical research projects terminated: 173

Increase in out-of-pocket payments by veterans: $424 million

Percentage increase in VA health care funding over Fiscal Year 2005: 0.4

Friday, March 09, 2007

The Newt, the Newt, the Newt is on Fire...

In an act of not so surprising hypocrisy, former Congressman and Presidential candidate, Newt Gingrich admitted to hate monger, Focus on the Family commandant James Dobson, that he in fact, had an extramarital affair.

It just so happens he had this affair, while he was trying to impeach President Clinton.
Gingrich argued in the interview, however, that he should not be viewed as a hypocrite for pursuing Clinton's infidelity.

"The president of the United States got in trouble for committing a felony in front of a sitting federal judge," the former Georgia congressman said of Clinton's 1998 House impeachment on perjury and obstruction of justice charges. "I drew a line in my mind that said, 'Even though I run the risk of being deeply embarrassed, and even though at a purely personal level I am not rendering judgment on another human being, as a leader of the government trying to uphold the rule of law, I have no choice except to move forward and say that you cannot accept ... perjury in your highest officials."

Of course not. Of course he thinks he's not a hypocrite.

I wonder what he thinks of Scooter Libby?

But, if he felt so bad about this, and if he actually knows he not a hypocrite, why did he wait 10 years to publicly disclose this? Should he not have done this 10 years ago, in the midst of his Clinton bashing?

It's not about the apology here, its about the political spin of a strong GOP Presidential Candidate.

Nevermind his fling was with a Congressional staffer.

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Mark Olson: Justice delayed

A LTE in the SC Times this morning hits Representative Mark Olson for contradictions between his personal life and his campaign rhetoric.

First he asked for a new arraignment to start the process all over again. When that was denied, he asked for a trial date in June, after the legislative session was over. The judge offered him three trial dates, one in March, April and May. Olson took the last one.

His efforts seem to be aimed at delaying the inevitable ethics investigation and his possible expulsion until the next session in January, rather than bringing this matter to a close and moving on.

... Olson ran on the issues of personal integrity and responsibility for one's actions. It's past the time for him to apply this slogan to himself.



Indeed. Responsibility and accountability seem to have been lost with some of our elected leaders. Perhaps Olson sees the writing on the wall and is delaying the inevitable? Who knows, but in the meanwhile, constituents in our area suffer, while a legislator flops in limbo.

Monday, February 19, 2007

Pro-war rhetoric

Great commentary in the Strib today!

Chait sums up the story by closing strongly.
So, there you have it, the case for supporting Bush: Trust the commander in
chief, don't undermine the troops, withdrawal equals defeat. These aren't
arguments to support Bush's strategy, they're generic pro-war arguments. Change
a few details and these lines could support Napoleon's invasion of Russia or the
Crusader occupation of Jerusalem or almost any war. Generic pro-war arguments
may be trite, but that's what you turn to when you've given up on reality.

Of course, the right will continue to hijack "patriotism" and "support our troops" despite the fact that they have not had any semblance of a plan for Iraq over the past 4 years.

Sunday, February 18, 2007

Mac Hammond LTE's in the Startribune

The Strib had some interesting LTE's today, some defending Hammond and others taking him to task.

Mr Johnson from Big Lake stated in his LTE that the people were after Hammond because of how much money he makes. I disagree. It's not about how much money he's making, it's about how someone with no religious training at all (Bachelors degree in English from VMI) twists biblical passages in order to benefit his ventures. I honestly could care less about how much money Hammond makes. Let's examine the use of his pulpit for political purposes. Let's examine the allegations that he forces LWCC employee's to tithe and maniuplates bible passages to guilt the remainder of his congregation to do so.

One LTE calls those of us who embrace being liberal and the concept of accountability as "anti-God". I love how conservatives, the religious right, loves to hijack the morality/religion/faith areas in our lives when in fact, those that preach so high and mighty on these issues, seem to fall from grace very quickly.

Ted Haggard anyone?

Two LTE's go another way with Hammond though.

Nothing illustrated the poverty of the "Prosperity Gospel" more clearly than
Mac Hammond's own dismissive remark, "It's impossible to bless someone else or be a blessing if you have nothing to bless them with."

This must come as a big shock to the millions of faithful around the world who
venerate Mother Teresa as a model of Christian love.

and
As a semi-regular viewer of Mac Hammond's televised Sunday services, I am more
concerned by his politics than his finances. Three weeks ago, he told us to "wake up, (Iraq) had WMDs, they just sent them to Syria before we got there."
Then we learned that the time for diplomacy with Iran is over. The United States
should preemptively strike before Iran kills us first. And the congregation shouted "Amen!"

Sounds like the drumbeat of war that got us into Iraq.

Sunday, February 11, 2007

Mac Hammond in the Strib

Months ago, the City Pages ran a great story on Mac Hammond and the Living World Christian Center, chronicling what is really going on at the LWCC. Pressure to continue to give beyond one's means was prevalent, as well as an air of superiority.

Today, the Startribune picked up the story. Similar to the response at the City Pages, I would expect to see some interesting LTE's to the Strib in the coming weeks.
Last week, a Washington watchdog group filed a formal complaint with the Internal Revenue Service against Hammond's Living Word Christian Center, which now has nearly 10,000 members, broadcasts weekly services to local and national television audience, and runs an array of businesses.

The group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, says the church gave loans to Hammond at favorable rates and created a sweetheart deal on a plane lease, possibly violating federal tax law that forbids insiders from benefiting from a charitable organization. But church officials said they are confident that they are complying with tax laws.

Meanwhile, some religious leaders and fellow evangelical ministers are criticizing Hammond's unapologetic embrace of wealth -- from his two planes to his luxury cars and high-end condos. In recent weeks, Hammond also has angered Muslims for controversial remarks about Islam.

Hammond is also under fire for his public support of Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, whom he publically supported at a church service this past fall. In fact, Hammond stated that he was going to vote for Bachmann. Unfortunately, he was not aware that he didn't even reside in Bachmann's district.

We have reported on Hammond's troubles previously.

Joe over at Minnesota Campaign Report has a great post up about the Strib story and his previous writings on Hammond as well!

I am looking forward to seeing how this story moves now that "main stream media" sources have picked up on it.

Sunday, January 07, 2007

Ellison letter

How many more of these things are we going to have to see?

The SC Times has published an opinion today discussing whether or not Congressman Ellison can be trusted to uphold the Constitution.

Prior to taking office, Ellison even went back to his home state of Michigan and delivered a speech to fellow Muslims: "On Jan. 4, I will go swear an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States. I'll place my hand on the Quran," Ellison said to loud applause and cries of "Allahu akbar." (The same cries 19 other Muslims cried out on Sept. 11).

He continued, in part: "Muslims, you're up to bat right now. ... How do you know that Allah ... did not bring you here so that you could understand how to teach people what tolerance was, what justice was? How do you know that you're not here to teach this country?"

Teach America tolerance? Insulting to say the least.

According to Aafar Sheikh Idris, founder and chairman of American Open University, "Islam cannot be separated from the state," and no Muslim elected to Congress or the White House can swear to uphold the Constitution and still be a Muslim because the law of Allah as expressed in the Quran is supreme.

Can Minnesota voters trust Ellison to uphold our Constitution, our freedoms and our values when the Quran allows no free will and thought and no freedoms to women?

Congressman Ellison, in a ceremonial swearing in, used a Koran owned by Thomas Jefferson. In a ceremonial fashion, Minnesota nice was shed and angry letters such as this have littered newspapers and xenophobic opinions have pierced the conservative radio waves.

Compare Congressman Ellison and his beliefs to Congresswoman Bachmann, a devout Christian. Bachmann has historically been an extremist GOPer, aligning herslef with anti-public education groups, while fighting to oppress the GLBT community and advocates for a woman's right to choose. Bachmann has also supported the Bush tax cuts and "plan" for Iraq. In many cases, she distances herself from the true populist agenda that Minnnesotan's embrace.

Story Chat has erupted today, with close to 300 responses.

Readers are also questioning Bachmann.

smarty from wstearns
Comment Posted: 1/7/2007 9:36:37 AM
Glen, I am with you. I believe that Ellison will work within the Constitution but not so sure about our Pres. I am also waiting to see how Michelle does. If she has the melt downs she had at the state level, the 6th will have little representation at the National level as she will be rubbing her bruised feelings more than representing those who voted her in. Ellison has shown that he will and can work with others for the betterment (probably not a word) of the country and MN in particular. I believe those who elected him were well aware of his beliefs and goals. They chose him over his opponent(s). Time will tell but give the guy a chance. I also am old enough to remember when many felt JFK would never make it in the Presidency b/c he was Catholic. He would not be able to run a country and adhere to his beliefs. He did so in his short time in office. He was a fairly successful President.

Raindog
Comment Posted: 1/7/2007 9:46:27 AM
Keith Ellison may be a good congressman, of he may be a bad congressman. His faith will only be no more of a reason than Michelle Bachman's faith.
But the difference between Bachman's faith and Ellison's faith seems transparent. Bachman claims her faith and uses her faith to make decisions. It is less clear how much Keith Ellison's faith will effect his decisions.
In regard to using Thomas Jefferson's Q'ran, I believe it is a wise choice. One that clearly shows Mr. Ellison to be far more aware than our own retarded congressperson.
And then there is Charlene Singer....
Ohmigawd, where do we start? Her comments are rife with misunderstanding and fear. Deep psychological distress and ignorance. These are mountains that only she can climb. We could show her the path, but ignorance is hard to eliminate without a willingness and a natural curiosity to learn. Traits that our Miss Singer seems to be lacking.


Yet, Ellison gets the brunt of negative attention. Parking tickets aside, the people of the 5th CD elected Congressman Ellison to represent them. He took his oath and swore to upohld the Constitution of the United States. In a ceremony, he placed his right hand on a religious book the majority of Americans do not care to understand.

He swore to uphold the Constitution of the United States, with his hand on a religious book, not swearing to uphold the Koran with his hand on the Constitution.

Let's see what Congressman Ellison does for Minnesota before being indicted by the media.

Monday, December 25, 2006

Bachmann is the Chosen One, Part IV

The final piece from the City Pages

WHEN Bachmann won the GOP endorsement for the Sixth CD, she used a familiar strategy: Overturn the old-school delegates with new ones from the church. With that, she defeated two longtime and well-known Republicans—State Rep. Jim Knoblauch and State Sen. Phil Krinkie—to run as the Republican candidate for the U.S. House. But this time no one was particularly surprised. The political landscape has shifted in Bachmann's favor.

The Sixth, which runs northwest from Stillwater past St. Cloud, is odd political terrain. Little more than a decade ago, much of it was rural, but now it's full of bedroom communities, new highway interchanges, and McMansions. The Sixth is the whitest district in the state (95 percent) and the median household income is $60,893, some $16,000 above the national average, according to 2004 census numbers. In the last presidential election, George W. Bush received 57 percent of the Sixth District vote, even though he lost the state of Minnesota. All of this would seem to favor Bachmann.

But the Sixth District is also home to some folks with strong libertarian leanings. Many working-class and first-time voters turned out there in 1998 to help propel Jesse Ventura to the governor's mansion. And Paul Wellstone twice captured significant votes in some enclaves of the district. It's unlikely that Bachmann's past on social issues and school reform would attract these people. (Just last week, polls released by Emily's List regarding "five competitive House districts" showed a narrow gap in the Sixth, with Bachmann at 44 percent to Wetterling's 41 percent.)

And it's clear, on the stump, that she knows this. One weekday evening in early August, there was a debate at the VFW in Forest Lake between Bachmann and the Independence Party's John Binkowski. (Wetterling did not participate.) Bachmann talked of a permanent repeal of the "death tax," and mentioned that she was a tax attorney no fewer than five times. "I am a federal tax attorney," she said at one point, calling for an overhaul of the U.S. tax code. "That's my background and my profession."

She then called for more "local control" in the public schools. But if you get Bachmann off those two issues, she's on less certain footing. Take this answer to a question about raising the minimum wage: "In Minnesota, we have only 3.6 percent unemployment. We are the workingest state in the nation. We have more two-income families than any state in the nation. We have more women in the work force than any state in the nation. We have more people working two or three jobs than anywhere else." She concluded that "minimum wage in this state is not a big issue." The book on Bachmann, and it's at times very apparent, is that when she's off-message, she's doomed.

A few days earlier, Bachmann was on a congressional candidate panel at Farm Fest 2006, in Redwood Falls, far out of her district. There were displays of farm equipment everywhere, and about 300 people had gathered under a white tent to hear the candidates field questions. Bachmann immediately made a point of saying she "married a dairy farmer" and spoke of the days when she and Marcus would milk the cows on his father's farm.

"That's something that certainly doesn't fit with my image of Michele," chuckles Michael LaFave when told of this. Bachmann is petite to the point of looking frail. She often is surrounded by people—supporters, staffers, fellow politicians, Marcus—who seem intent on sheltering her from any outside forces. From a distance, she looks youthful and composed. Up close, she appears at once older and less self-assured. In short, she's made for television. At Farm Fest, she looked completely out of her element.

There were complicated questions about farm policy—What's your stance on crop insurance? Should the current farm bill be extended?—that, in fairness, made sense to only four or five of the nine candidates on the panel. But while some candidates simply admitted as much, Bachmann repeatedly referred to "marrying into a farm family" in weaving answers that never quite got around to the questions.

In response to a complex question about setting up a permanent disaster fund for farmers and ranchers who raise beef cattle, Wetterling balked and admitted she didn't really understand the question or have an answer. Bachmann, by contrast, dove right in. "I appreciate the question, because on our dairy farm, we raise beef cattle as well," she began. "One thing we can never, ever, ever get away from is that we are not two separate entities: Commodities. Livestock. If there's anything that can interact, it's commodities and livestock. Without commodities, you don't have livestock. It's just that simple."

She concluded by noting that, as a mother of the sum of 28 children, she has learned that when families don't get fed, "they get cranky."

This drew a small chuckle from the crowd, but it was an uncomfortable one. One farmer turned to the one sitting next to him, shaking his head. "What the fuck is she talking about?" he wanted to know.

Bachmann is the Chosen One, Part III

A third installment from City Pages

But that's exactly what happened. Laidig believes, in retrospect, that he was one of a number of moderate Republicans targeted by elements of their own party as vulnerable candidates in the run-up to the 2000 races. "And it became a different kind of party," he says. "Suddenly all of these religious litmus tests were going on, and they were getting support in the churches. My father was a very conservative minister, and very politically active. But never once did he bring the pulpit to politics, and he never brought politics to the pulpit."

On April 1, 2000, the GOP held its endorsing convention for the District 56 Senate seat. Laidig was immediately put off when he saw a number of new delegates—churchgoers. He also realized that they were against him, calling him "a Republican in name only," despite his 30 years of service to the party. To his surprise, he had an opponent—Michele Bachmann—and was caught off-guard. Bachmann won the endorsement on the first ballot. (The two went on to face off in the primary, which Bachmann won.)

"It hit me like a tsunami," Laidig says. "I heard the rumble out there, but I never thought the wave would come."

"Republican Senator Loses Endorsement Over Profile," read a post-mortem headline on the Maple River website. "Senator Laidig is known as the senator who for years has been opposing the party platform, and local activists wanted to support a candidate who would support them at the legislature," the story said in reference to the religious-right voting bloc that ousted Laidig.
The story went on to contend that "Dr. Bachmann herself, who had no intention of running, was shocked by her victory," and that a "spontaneous and genuine draft effort" had convinced Bachmann to run. "I came in wearing jeans, a sweatshirt and moccasins, and I had no makeup on at all," the story quotes Bachmann as saying. "I had not one piece of literature, I had made not one phone call, and spent not five cents and I did not solicit a vote."

"Absolute bullshit," Laidig says now. "She planned this all along."

WHILE Michele Bachmann was rising through the political ranks, her husband Marcus—a lumbering, soft-featured man—was working toward a psychology doctorate and a practice in Lake Elmo. There is an overt Christian theme attached to the practice. "Bachmann and Associates believes in providing all clients with quality counseling in a Christian environment," reads the mission statement on the business's website. Some of the listed specialties of the clinic and its counselors include "abuse issues," "co-dependency," "men's and women's issues," "shame," and "spiritual issues."

But some observers claim that the mission of the practice includes counseling homosexuals in an effort to "ungay" them. "It is absolutely sincere," adds former school board member Cecconi. "They specialize in 'reparation' regarding sexual orientation."

Marcus Bachmann, who is also 50, denies that is part of his clinic's practice. "That's a false statement," he says, refusing to answer any questions that don't have to do with Bachmann and Associates. "Am I aware that the perception is out there? I can't comment on that." Still, Bachmann offers, "If someone is interested in talking to us about their homosexuality, we are open to talking about that. But if someone comes in a homosexual and they want to stay homosexual, I don't have a problem with that."

Questions about his work aside, Marcus Bachmann has never played much of a public role in his wife's campaigns, and neither her allies nor her detractors seem to know much about him. But many believe he has played a huge part in the evolution of Michele Bachmann's religious convictions and, in turn, her political career. At the GOP endorsing convention in May, he worked the floor of delegates for his wife. Before that, he had gone on the political offensive. "She's pro-life, pro-family, and knows the values of the [Sixth] district," he told the Stillwater Courier in March 2006. "Whatever's left, she'll eat for dessert." He added that his wife would "eat up" Patty Wetterling in the general election.

Stepbrother Michael LaFave remembers that the Bachmanns' born-again identity started to cause divisions in the family sometime in the mid-1980s. "She kind of went all the way back to the Old Testament, and wouldn't eat pork and things like that," LaFave says. "Things got much more rigid around them. She got into it very deeply. I don't want to say she went off the deep end, but you might say something like that." With respect to Marcus Bachmann, LaFave says he has always "purposely stayed at arm's length. We just chit-chat about the family when we see each other."

On the campaign trail, Michele Bachmann has said her husband grew up on a family dairy farm in western Wisconsin. According to a brief biography that ran in the Forest Lake Times when Bachmann and Associates opened an office there in March 2005, he earned a master's degree in counseling from Regent University in Virginia Beach, Virginia, a school then affiliated with Christian Broadcasting Network pitchman Pat Robertson. Bachmann later was awarded a doctorate in clinical psychology from an institution listed as Union Graduate School on his clinic's website, an apparent reference to Union Institute in Cincinnati, though nothing on either of the Bachmanns' public résumés suggests they ever lived in Ohio.

Last November, the Bachmanns attended a "Minnesota Pastors' Summit" at Grace Church in Eden Prairie. Some 300 religious leaders participated in the event, which was organized by the conservative, antigay Minnesota Family Council. Michele Bachmann was there to lead a session on the gay marriage amendment, while Marcus offered a presentation titled "The Truth About the Homosexual Agenda."

Curt Prins, a 35-year-old marketing executive from Minneapolis, attended. Prins, who is gay, says he went because he was "curious" and wanted to "understand the language" of the antigay movement. "There was so much bile, I nearly had to leave," Prins recalls. For Marcus Bachmann's session, Prins says there were more than 100 people crammed in a room at Grace, and most of the presentation involved stereotypes of gays. "He was saying how homosexuality was a choice, that it was not genetics," Prins says. "He was claiming there was a high predominance of sexual abuse in the GLBT community. There was no research to back any of this up." (Marcus Bachmann refused to answer questions about the seminar.)

The climax of the presentation was when, according to Prins, Bachmann brought up "three ex-gays, like part of a PowerPoint presentation." The trio, two white men and a black woman, all testified that they had renounced their homosexuality. "One of them said, 'If I was born gay, then I'll have to be born again,'" Prins recalls. "The crowd went crazy."

"Listening to him," Prins surmises, "it becomes clear that he's had a huge impact on her. He might be the spearhead of this whole religious/gay issue." Shortly after Bachmann announced her candidacy for U.S. Congress, there was an announcement on a website called the Minnesota Christian Chronicle. "Michele is a compassionate, intelligent woman of integrity who has a calling in her life. I am confident in Michele's ability to serve the constituents superbly well in the Sixth District," Marcus Bachmann was quoted as saying. "As her husband, I fully endorse Michele running for U.S. Congress. I am so thankful for her Christian testimony. She is a servant who honors Christ."

But Michele Bachmann's Christian testimony has not endeared her to everyone in her family. When Bachmann held a hearing on the gay marriage ban at the Capitol last April, she got a rude surprise: Sitting just a few feet away was her stepsister, Helen LaFave, who chose the occasion to come out publicly for the first time, with her partner of 20 years in attendance. "This issue has been very hurtful to me personally, and divisive for our family," LaFave told the Star Tribune at the time. Bachmann said at the time that she had taken a family vote on the gay marriage ban, and that family members favored it by a 6-3 margin. But both Michael and Helen LaFave insist she never spoke to them about it. Helen LaFave added that Bachmann ignored letters LaFave had sent her about the matter.

(Helen LaFave, 46, declined to be interviewed for this story, saying, "My dad is in his 80s now, and it's too much to have all of this out there for him.")

"I've got to be clear that I've always been kind of proud of Michele," Michael LaFave says cautiously. That all went sour, though, as Bachmann increasingly became the face of the efforts to ban gay marriage at the Capitol. LaFave had no choice but to take things personally: "I wrote her an e-mail, and asked very nicely why she had to carry the water on this, knowing that my father has a gay daughter. How could she discriminate against Helen?

"She's out there courting a family values agenda, but she's saying things about her own family that's not true," he claims. "She could have been talking to the voters the whole time about having a gay sister," he says. "That at least would have been honest. Dick Cheney had the good sense to do that with his daughter. He had the good sense to know not to engage the base, to not get involved in the debate, because he knew how much it would hurt his daughter. If anyone spent the most time together between the LaFaves and the Ambles," LaFave concludes, "it was Michele and Helen.

"What I'd say to Michele is that you've got a situation here that you didn't have to create. You didn't have to go about it this way," he says, and pauses before announcing he'll likely vote for Patty Wetterling. "I'd say, 'Michele, for all of this, you've lost your family. You've lost my vote.'"

Bachmann is the Chosen One, Part II

Part II of the City Pages Bachmann story.

ONE of Michael LaFave's first memories of Michele Bachmann is the two of them cruising around Anoka in his 1961 Chevy as she showed him teen hangouts and points of interest around town. It was 1973, and LaFave's father had just married Michele Amble's mother. He was a senior in high school then, soon to leave the newly blended household on Washington Street, and she was a year younger. "To say we were close would be overstating it," he says of the Ambles and LaFaves, who now counted nine children among them. "But we were a family unit."

By his own admission, LaFave, 51 years old and a union representative who lives in Forest Lake, did not get to know his new stepsister all that well. "I remember that she was book-smart, and did pretty well in school," he recalls. "And she was in a couple of beauty pageants.... She was not overtly political." She was not particularly religious, either, as far as he could see; LaFave calls her born-again identity "a later event in her life," dating to the years after she had gone away to college.

After graduating from Anoka High School in 1974, Michele Amble enrolled at what is now Winona State University. There she became interested in politics, she told the Star Tribune in a January 1, 2005 story, when she wandered into an American government class.

She also met Marcus Bachmann, who was majoring in social work. According to news and blog accounts, the two connected because they were both born-again Christians. Soon after she graduated with a degree in political science and English, the couple married, in 1978. As she has told the story more than once, the two were staunch Democrats who worked on Jimmy Carter's first presidential campaign. Eventually, she became disillusioned with the Democratic Party. The couple soon moved to Tulsa, Oklahoma, where Bachmann enrolled in the Coburn Law School, a Bible-based institution affiliated with Oral Roberts University. According to one version of her résumé, she earned a Juris Doctorate at Coburn in 1986, and post-doctorate degree from William and Mary Law School in Virginia in 1988.

According to Bachmann's CV, she landed a job with "the federal U.S. Tax Court" in St. Paul in 1988. One church bio lists her title there as a "federal litigation tax attorney"—the only job besides being state senator that Bachmann notes on the campaign trail. Some of her critics have called the designation misleading. Setting the record straight in early 2005, Bachmann admitted to City Pages that she in fact worked for the IRS going after tax cheats, a fact she never mentions when she is rallying anti-tax sentiments on the stump.

In 1992, Bachmann quit her job working for the Internal Revenue Service to become a stay-at-home mom. By that time, Marcus Bachmann had launched a career as a counselor/therapist. The couple eventually had five kids of their own (who now range in age from 11 to 23), and candidate Bachmann proudly notes that the couple has taken in 23 foster children over the years.

She didn't always stay at home, though. Increasingly, Bachmann was hitting the church and school circuit as a speaker, railing against what she deemed to be unreasonable federal and state mandates for education. She was a prized pupil in something called the Maple River Education Coalition, which later became EdWatch. (Former Governor Jesse Ventura once said of them, "The Maple River group, they think UFOs are landing next month. They think it's some big government federal conspiracy!") According to the mission statement on its website, EdWatch is concerned about the "undermining" of "constitutional freedoms" due in part to the country's "entire educational system." In the words of one editorial column reposted at the site, "Public education is not among the enumerated powers of the federal government."

Anytime there was a school issue in the east metro, Bachmann was there. "In 1993 or '94, Michele was stumping anti-standards rhetoric," longtime Stillwater School Board member Mary Cecconi recalls. "I went to a church in Lake Elmo, because I wanted to hear her. Everything she said was met with catcalls and 'hallelujah' and 'amen sister.'"

By this time, Bachmann had become one of the founders of the New Heights Charter School, one of the first charter schools in the country. By law, charter schools have to be overseen by a public school district because they are funded, at least in part, by public money as tax-exempt nonprofits. In the fall of 1993, Denise Stephens had one daughter teaching at the school, and one daughter enrolled in the ninth grade. It was the first year that school at New Heights was in session as part of the Stillwater school district.

According to Stephens, it became clear that the charter school's board of directors was populated with right-wing Christians, all of them seeming acolytes of Bachmann. "I started raising questions about whether we were using public money to fund a religious school," Stephens recalls. Among the proposals coming from Bachmann and company was to expand the curriculum to teach creationism. The directors of the charter school, she recalls, were also advocating that "something called '12 Christian principles' be taught, very much like the 10 Commandments." One of the final straws for Stephens, who notes that she's been "a Republican since 1978," was that school officials would not allow the Disney movie Aladdin to be shown because it involved magic and supposedly taught paganism.

Stephens and other parents soon had confrontational meetings with Bachmann and the rest of the charter school group. "One member of Michele's entourage talked about how he had visions, and that God spoke to him directly," Stephens says. "He told us that as Christians we had to lay our lives down for it. I remember getting in the car with my husband afterward and telling him, 'This is a cult.'"

(This closely echoes something former state Senator Laidig says about Bachmann: "She's kind of a spooky person. She's one of those people who feels that God is speaking directly to her, and that justifies her actions.")

Eventually, the Bachmann and Stephens forces met in front of the Stillwater School Board. When confronted, according to Stephens, Bachmann grew angry: Are you going to question my integrity? she demanded. According to Stephens and others, Bachmann and four others resigned on the spot that night, offering what could be described as religious trash-talk on the way out. Bachmann still cites the charter school as a major accomplishment, but makes no mention of her leaving.

BACHMANN was hardly cowed by the setback. She channeled her passions into an increasing number of pamphlets and essays on the ills of public schools. By 1996, Mary Cecconi was sitting on the school board, which made her part of an ongoing sparring match between the board and Bachmann over curriculum. "She wanted to introduce Intelligent Design," Cecconi recalls. "And when you hear her talk about Intelligent Design, it makes sense. I believe in giving children all the information out there, too, so they can make their own decisions. But Intelligent Design wasn't even a school of thought, it wasn't even a viable theory."

Bachmann decided to run for the Stillwater School Board herself in 1999. In a move that still irks many locals, the state's Republican Party lined up a slate of candidates, for what was supposed to be a nonpartisan race. There were five open seats that year, and 19 candidates. The GOP-endorsed candidates became known locally as the "Slate of Five." Cecconi, who was running for re-election, says, "There was this overwhelming sentiment that we didn't want our school system politicized."

Bill Pulkrabek, the Washington County commissioner, had put together the group of GOP-endorsed candidates, and admits now that there was "a little bit of a backlash about the endorsement. It put up some red flags." Collectively, the five endorsed candidates finished dead last in the field.

But it was hardly a losing proposition for Bachmann. The school board run is widely credited with raising her political profile for the first time, giving her campaign experience, and endearing her to party kingmakers. Pulkrabek, who was also the GOP's chair for the Stillwater district at the time, notes that the '99 school board race inspired three times the usual turnout. He also says that was the year he met Bachmann, who told him she wanted to run for Laidig's seat. He, instead, encouraged her to run for school board first: "We talked about knocking off Gary later."
Gary Laidig was running for re-election to be District 56's state senator in 2000. Laidig, then a 28-year incumbent of state House and Senate seats representing the area, recalls being surprised to encounter Bachmann (who by this point had added the title "Dr." to her name) and a number of people from her church at a Woodbury School Board meeting in the late 1990s. She stood up and started denouncing the school's academic standards, and took exception to the national and local school-to-work programs.

Still, Laidig didn't think much of it: "It dawned on me that this [education activism] was her new gig, but I never thought she was going to run for my seat."